Google favours friends in new social search
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 17 Feb 2011 at 17:24
Google's search results will pull in more personalised content and tailor search results according to what your contacts like, following changes to its Social Search tool.
The tool provides “information from the people that matter to you, whether they’re publishing on YouTube, Flickr or their own blog or website”.
Google said social results would now be presented within the standard search page, ranked upon their relevance, rather than being a tag-on as in the past.
“You’ll start seeing more from people like co-workers and friends, with annotations below the results they’ve shared or created,” the company said on its official blog.
“If you’re thinking about climbing Mount Kilimanjaro and your colleague Matt has written a blog post about his own experience, then we’ll bump up that post with a note and a picture.”
The amount of interest your friends have shown in certain subjects could also see that content boosted up the rankings, so if a colleague had tweeted a link to a video about Arsenal’s Barcelona victory, the footage would be bumped up the rankings following a search for Champions League.
The company was at pains to highlight privacy tools, after the costly legal fiasco following the launch of Buzz, when Google had to pay $8.5 million to settle a lawsuit over the way it implemented the social tool in Gmail.
“We’ve given you more control over how you connect accounts, and made connecting accounts more convenient,” Google said.
“You can still connect accounts publicly on your Google profile, but now we’ve added a new option to connect accounts privately in your Google Account."
The service would only be active when users had signed in to their Google accounts, the company said, adding that it would be rolled out over the next week.
"Who keeps company with the wolf, will learn to howl."
I'm going to unfriend all my dumber friends right now!
By stasi47 on 17 Feb 2011
It says there:
“information from the people that matter to you, whether they’re publishing on YouTube, Flickr or their own blog or website”
while it should say:
“information from the people that matter to you, whether they want it or not” :>
By Josefov on 18 Feb 2011
I'd much prefer unbiased unadvertised factual (as much as can be expected) based upon my search terms. If I wanted to search for my acquaintances I'd go on facebook are ask them.
By Manuel on 18 Feb 2011
- Play it again: Berlin's Computer Game Museum
- Switching from iPhone to Android: what I miss, what I don't
- Tech City: Easy to score when you move the goalposts
- How to remove SkyDrive from the Windows 8.1 Explorer
- Switching from iPhone to Android? Switch off iMessage
- Why is Google pumping more money into Firefox?
- Sky Broadband Shield review
- Samsung Galaxy S4: how to double your battery life
- Motorola Moto G review: first look
- IBM Watson meets Willy Wonka
- The importance of load balancing
- Windows Phone App Studio: an easy way to create your first Windows Phone 8 app
- The end of Windows XP support: what it really means for businesses
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Using Buffer to manage your social media
- Microsoft needs its own Steve Jobs
- Forget credit cards: hackers want your Facebook account
- Can't get fast enough broadband? Here's what to do
- Leap Motion and the battle against UI stagnation
- How to build a really bad network