Google faces EU probe over doped search results
By Barry Collins
Posted on 30 Nov 2010 at 11:26
The EU has launched an investigation into whether Google is deliberately doctoring its search results to favour its own services.
The Commission says it will investigate whether Google is abusing its "dominant position" in online search, by giving preference to its own services in both sponsored links and organic results.
The Commission will look into allegations that Google lowered the 'Quality Score' for sponsored links of competing vertical search services
The search engine stands accused of "lowering the ranking of unpaid search results of competing services which are specialised in providing users with specific online content such as price comparisons (so-called vertical search services) and by according preferential placement to the results of its own vertical search services in order to shut out competing services," the EU said in a statement.
"The Commission will also look into allegations that Google lowered the 'Quality Score' for sponsored links of competing vertical search services. The Quality Score is one of the factors that determine the price paid to Google by advertisers."
Furthermore, the Commission will investigate claims that Google prevents advertising partners from placing certain types of ads on other sites, with exclusivity deals designed to head off potential rivals.
It will also examine whether Google prevents advertisers from exporting data about their marketing campaigns to rival platforms.
Impartial results?
The investigation follows complaints from a British price comparison site, Foundem, and a French search engine.
Top stories on PC Pro
1) Dell's new laptop cooling system sucks
2) Leaks show US snubbed Brown's McKinnon plea
3) BT acting like 'heroin dealer' over fibre broadband
Foundem filed a complaint to the EU in February, arguing that Google routinely gives preference to its own price-comparison service - Google Shopping - in organic search results. Foundem claims that tweaking the search results propelled Google Shopping from an "ailing bit player to US market leader virtually overnight".
“There is a growing chasm between the enduring public perception of Google’s search results as comprehensive and impartial, and the reality that they are increasingly neither,” said Foundem’s CEO and co-founder Shivaun Raff.
The EU stresses it has no proof of any infringement, but will investigate the allegations made against Google as "a matter of priority".
Google has denied any wrongdoing. "Since we started Google we have worked hard to do the right thing by our users and our industry - ensuring that ads are always clearly marked, making it easy for users to take their data with them when they switch services and investing heavily in open-source projects," the company claimed in a statement.
"But there’s always going to be room for improvement, and so we’ll be working with the Commission to address any concerns.”
Addressing Foundem's allegations specifically, Google said: "We built Google for users, not websites, and the nature of ranking is that some websites will be unhappy with where they rank. Those sites have complained and even sued us over the years, but in all cases there were compelling reasons why their sites were ranked poorly by our algorithms.
"For example, Foundem, one of the sites that has complained publicly and to the European Commission, duplicates 79% of its website content from other sites, and we have consistently informed webmasters that our algorithms disadvantage duplicate sites."
From around the web
Never heard of...
Google Shopping, I've certainly never noticed it in my search results, although I do get results for various other price comparison sites.
Doing a quick search for a Samsung Galaxy gave no shopping sites in the first page of results, and neither Google nor Foundem appeared in the sponsored links.
And if Foundem is doing aggregation of other sites, it is hardly a surprise that they are not getting good results, as it is one of the first things any good SEO consultant will tell you not to do...
It sounds like Foundem's problem is either with themselves or with their SEO consultant. Either fire the consultant or generate your own content, simples...
By big_D on 30 Nov 2010 ![]()
Doesn't matter.
Impartial or not, Google still delivers the best results by some margin in my experience.
By qwertyisyourfriend on 30 Nov 2010 ![]()
input: ( http://www.fashionstyle2.com )
Hello,everybody,the good shoping place,the new season approaching,
click in. Let's facelift bar!
By liumimi on 1 Dec 2010 ![]()
P Rush
"For example, Foundem, one of the sites that has complained publicly and to the European Commission, duplicates 79% of its website content from other sites, and we have consistently informed webmasters that our algorithms disadvantage duplicate sites."
To overcome this obstacle - just put Google's ads on your site and watch your site soar to the top of the search results even with 100% duplicate content like scraper sites.
Over time Google's search results have become less useful and relevant because they are biased.
By momofone on 8 Dec 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
