"Three wise monkeys" dominate net neutrality debate
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 11 Nov 2010 at 15:34
A UK academic has called on the European Commission and regulators to apply closer scrutiny before accepting industry points of view in the net neutrality debate.
The Open Internet and Net Neutrality in Europe summit taking place in Brussels today follows the closure of the EU consultation on net neutrality.
There are three wise monkeys on net neutrality that are seeing no evil, hearing no evil and speaking no evil
The consensus of the consultation was that net neutrality was important, but that it didn't necessarily need regulating as current rules were effective enough to keep the internet an open environment.
However, the vast majority of the responses to the consultation came from businesses and trade bodies, leading to scepticism from Dr Chris Marsden from the Essex University School of Law.
Marsden was the only speaker at the summit that didn't represent a regulator, a communications company – such as Cisco, AT&T or Skype, who were all present – or a trade body.
“There are three wise monkeys on net neutrality that are seeing no evil, hearing no evil and speaking no evil - and I think you might have heard from many of them today,” Marsden said.
“I used to think that there was no net neutrality problem in Europe until at every meeting I went to on the subject I heard people saying there was no problem, which always makes me suspicious.”
Marsden went on to caution industry regulators, such as the UK's Ofcom, against accepting the word and opinions of industry figures without greater scrutiny.
“It's one thing saying 'We have received no formal complaints,' as Ofcom has, but we need to investigate the issue and that means getting a body of evidence about what's going on,” he said.
“It is extremely easy to hide discrimination and it's difficult to tell if something is a natural degradation or something more deliberate, profitable or remunerative and we need to be more open.”
From around the web
I must admit, I'm a little bit conflicted about this one.
On one hand I'm all for net neutrality if it means that American mega corperations like Google, Microsoft and so on cannot use their huge economic clout to secure a privilaged position on the internet at the disadvantage of smaller UK companies.
Yet, on the other hand, I am strongly against it if it prevents my ISP from throttling irresponsibly configured P2P software that floods my local network infrastructure with billions of tiny packets that slow down everybody else's connections, just so some spotty teenager can download a pirate DVD.
We need to make sure that net neutrality doesn't interfere with an ISP's ability to manage its network.
By Perfectblue97 on 11 Nov 2010 ![]()
Nicely put...
...Perfectblue97
You highlight the conflict well. I don't see why we cant have both, in a framework analogous to freedom of speech. FOS rights exist, but may be superseded by laws which come into force when a person uses their freedom of speech to incite hatred, stir up violence or otherwise break the law. Surely we can find a way of permitting people to upload and download freely, whilst also enabling ISPs or other enforcement agencies to stop them if they break the law?
Regulation is required when there is risk to customers. Until monopolies emerge (they are forming) then regulation may not be required, but I tend to agree with Chris Marsden when he says that industry leaders saying "there is no problem" makes you think that they are every keen to remain below the regulators' radar. I work in a highly regulated industry (pharmaceuticals) and see this from the corporate side, so my suspicion is not unfounded.
By Mat1971 on 12 Nov 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
