ICO: we won't be pushed to "knee jerk" Google decision
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 1 Nov 2010 at 13:20
The UK's data watchdog is refusing to bow to pressure to take action against Google over its Street View data collection, saying now is not the time for "knee jerk" reactions.
Back in April, Google said it had collected data as its Street View camera car scanned for Wi-Fi connections. At the time, the Information Commissioner's Office looked at a sample of the UK data, and declared it not "meaningful".
Last week, Google was forced to admit by other countries' watchdogs that it had collected more than bits and pieces of data, but had inadvertently grabbed email addresses, passwords and URLs from home Wi-Fi networks.
Since then, the ICO has come under renewed pressure to take action against Google.
"As a regulator, the ICO must take a calm and measured approach to the issue of data privacy and ensure that we do not get caught up in the emotive arguments which will only naturally take place around sensitive issues such as the inadvertent collection of data by Google Street View," the ICO said.
We will not be panicked into a knee-jerk response to an alarmist agenda
"We must remain evidence-based and although our enquiries, along with the enquiries of our international counterparts, are taking longer than many people might like, it is of paramount importance that we get our decision right in order to ensure the public can be confident that their long-term privacy interests are being maintained," it added.
The ICO said that none of its fellow watchdogs had yet taken action against Google, and noted that the Met Police had dropping its case. However, several European countries as well as US states are still investigating.
"Whilst we continue to work with out other international counterparts on this issue, we will not be panicked into a knee-jerk response to an alarmist agenda," the ICO said.
The ICO reiterated that it was considering using its enforcement powers. However, that does not include the ability to issue fines, as the ICO claims the £500,000 penalty was not introduced until after the incident took place.
That means the only action the ICO can actually take is to serve a so-called enforcement notice, requiring Google to improve its data protection systems - which the web giant has already done in light of the negative attention, removing the Wi-Fi scanning equipment from its cars.
From around the web
AFAIK this is a problem caused by widespread unsecured wireless access points. It's not clear that Google intended any harm, and an argument could be made that the users were asking for it by broadcasting their web activity throughout the neighbourhood. Furthermore it only became apparent to me why they were doing this when I was using HTML5Rocks website and Google were able to identify my location through my wireless access point (which is secured, by the way).
Why has it taken so long for the media to report the full issue so that members of the public don't have to make their own interpretations.
By c6ten on 1 Nov 2010 ![]()
btw it's fairly easy to disable geolocation in your web-browser, further illustration that this is a story without a plot.
By c6ten on 1 Nov 2010 ![]()
Asking For It!?
"an argument could be made that the users were asking for it by broadcasting their web activity throughout the neighbourhood"
And women who are raped are asking for it by dressing provocatively?
People who are mugged are asking for it by walking alone in the dark or advertising their ipod by using Apple's ear phones?
Pensioners are asking for it when the fall prey to financial cons, online or in real life?
With all due respect, whether or not an individual takes "sensible" precautions, if another takes advantagae thorugh illegal action, it's still god damned illegal. "They were askign for it" should never be even countenanced as a defense, and I find such a suggestion offensive.
By matbailie on 2 Nov 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
