Another fine Mesh: Microsoft renames Live Sync again
By Barry Collins
Posted on 31 Aug 2010 at 14:01
Microsoft is once again doing its level best to confuse the computing public by renaming Windows Live Sync.
Two years ago, Microsoft launched a beta of free tool called Windows Live Mesh, which synchronised files across multiple PCs and offered 5GB of online storage.
Then, in June, it announced it was rolling Live Mesh into another similar product called Live Sync, with the combined product bearing the Live Sync name. (Just to add to the maelstrom of confusion, Microsoft also had another, separate product called Live Sync.)
Now, Microsoft has decided to go back to the original name of Windows Live Mesh. In a Windows Live blog post announcing the latest change of heart, Microsoft's principal program manager, Allison O’Mahony, states: "With the addition of remote access and cloud storage, we understand that the new program does more than sync files.
"So following the beta period, we’ll be using the name Windows Live Mesh going forward, which we feel best reflects our broader goal of allowing you to access your stuff across your devices."
Microsoft has also reversed its decision to reduce the online storage from 5GB to 2GB, to "ease the migration" for users of the current Windows Live Mesh.
The bad news is that users of the current Windows Live Mesh have to uninstall the old software, download the new product and start the synchronisation afresh.
Oh, and for the time being, the product is still being referred to as Windows Live Sync, until it comes out of a beta.
Everybody got that? Good.
From around the web
Skydrive
FFS Microsoft, why don't you just merge this and Skydrive finally? Why have to basically identical products running in parallel?
By ripclaw666 on 31 Aug 2010 ![]()
So confused, where does Windows Live SkyDrive fit in?
By Deano on 31 Aug 2010 ![]()
Beat me to it ripclaw :)
By Deano on 31 Aug 2010 ![]()
Does anyone at MS know what they are doing?
I too am already massively confused by the online file storage side of it - so much so that I'm not sure I can be bothered to use it. Clearly MS has several teams, none of which talk to each other about what they're doing.
Worryingly, Allison O’Mahony seems to think that remote access is an "addition". This has been in Live Mesh for ages, if not from the outset.
By halsteadk on 31 Aug 2010 ![]()
Well at least they are doing this in the Beta phase so the truth is most of the general public will not even be aware of it.
But they do like to make life difficult for themselves!
By Grunthos on 31 Aug 2010 ![]()
@halsteadk
Perhaps Alison was referring to the addition of those features to LiveSync, when LiveMesh was incorporated into it...? Benefit of the doubt, and all that...
By stephenjfa on 2 Sep 2010 ![]()
It's free and it works
I have tried out remote connect (equivalent to remote desktop connection, except it even works with Win7S, and is free). It works nicely. Very pleased to have it. Easier to set up than LogMeIn Free, which sometimes does not work for me.
I have tried out file sync, which also works, and is easy to set up. I agree that it partially overlaps SkyDrive, and therefore confused the hell out of me till I realised it is a separate facility. The web site could be made less confusing, which would help.
I have been an early adopter of Exchange Active Sync for Hotmail. I have it working on Win7, but also on iPod and iPad, and I might soon have it working on my Nokia phone. It 'just works', and I think people underestimate what a big step forward this is, to have a solution that works across platforms for the first time, and at no cost.
Bear in mind that a lot of separate pieces of technology are coming together now, and it is becoming apparent that MS has been playing a long game. It is a pincer movement big enough to ensnare Apple and Google and beat them. I am impressed by what I have seen so far, and I think MS deserve some positive comments for what they are doing.
Apple and Google have been greedy and uncooperative. MobileMe does nothing worth having (at GBP 5.00 per month). Google and Apple both want lock-in to their ecosystems. MS is opening it up to produce a cross-platform solution.
The FCC was invented to force 3 competing US phone companies to work together so that businesses did not need 3 phones on each employee's desk. It or someone should long ago have forced cooperation between MS, Apple, and Google. But no matter, MS is going to eat Apple and Google's lunch with Windows Live.
Am I an MS evangelist? I am just pissed off with Apple and Google. Especially Apple's greedy restrictiveness. I will never buy another Apple product.
By fogtax on 2 Sep 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement
