Adobe exec: Oracle takes "evil" title from Microsoft
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 25 Aug 2010 at 10:43
An Adobe executive has accused Oracle of being "evil" toward the world of open source.
Oracle picked up Sun in a $7.4 billion deal last year, and has angered the open-source world by filing a Java patent suit against Google Android and shutting down OpenSolaris.
These recent moves seem to indicate that the axis of evil has shifted south about 850 miles or so
"It’s fascinating watching the slow motion train wreck that is occurring between Oracle and the former open-source culture of Sun," wrote Dave McAllister in a post on the Adobe Open Source blog.
By taking such action against Google and OpenSolaris, McAllister said Oracle had "managed to move into the role formerly played by Microsoft".
"No company is perfect," he added. "But these recent moves seem to indicate that the axis of evil has shifted south about 850 miles or so."
While McAllister said he had "no problem" with companies making money from open-source code, he warned against hurting the community involvement that drives such projects.
"Oracle has smart people," he said. "They understand open source and its drive to developers. And yet, suddenly, it seems that Oracle is viewing open source as a new cash cow."
Oracle hasn't yet returned request for comment.
From around the web
Kettle, Pot &c
Adobe realises that for PDF and Flash to be ubiquitous they need to have Linux versions -but that is a million miles from being open source!
Adobe regularly vies with Microsoft in user comments over monopolistic behaviour and US-Europe price differentials.
By milliganp on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
Axis of Evil
Adobe, Microsoft, Oracle - all on the axis of evil.
By C64C128 on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
Who's he trying to kid? Adobe sits square in the middle of the axis of evil. They're even worse than Microsoft.
By SwissMac on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
How could we forget Apple? Surely they've topped it nowadays.
By timfrance on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
What does Adobe know about open-source? Waffle, IMHO.
By c6ten on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
Adobe always way ahead in terms of evil compared to Apple and Microsoft
Adobe = photoshop, postscript, etc. Everything that adobe produces not only closed source but also prohibitively expensive for mainstream. They are not only the enemy of opensource but also the enemy of mainstream people with small wallets. If Adobe were dominated we were still 'looking' those expensive postscript printers and also trying to buy postscript font cartridges to print 'Helvetica' on those. Oracle is another Adobe that believes computers and software only for professionals and everything should be 'prohibitively' expensive. Microsoft and Apple are different stories that actually competing for 'ordinary' people... We will see that Oracle prevents every use of Java etc.
By HopeLESS on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
It will be a sad day when current Java license holders find out they have to pay more. Oracle is being evil. Many developers will be forced to switch, pay more or shut down - more job losses :(
By nicomo on 25 Aug 2010 ![]()
Too little, too late
...For IBM... I think Oracle are going to hit IBM next, and IBM are going to regret not buying Sun when they had the chance!!!! They chose Java as they didn't want another repeat of MS-DOS, but uh-oh, it's happening again.
By rjd83 on 26 Aug 2010 ![]()
Being Good
The thing is that Sun may have been open source friendly, but their business was going down the tubes, which opened them up to being acquired.
It's no good being 'good' if you lose the battle against 'evil'.
And at the end of the day, Google are doing exactly the same thing with Android/Dalvik as Microsoft did to Java - embrace and extend. But of course Google are the ones who invented the whole 'evil' rehetoric.
By JulesLt on 26 Aug 2010 ![]()
Axis of Evil
Adobe, Microsoft, Oracle - all on the axis of evil.
By C64C128 on 25 Aug 2010
Read more: Adobe exec: Oracle takes "evil" title from Microsoft | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/360586/adobe-exec-orac
le-takes-evil-title-from-microsoft#ixzz0xhQqOip6
Be fair... apple needs to be in there too, they are far worse that the others, just in a smaller way.
Interesting seeing how "industry giants" criticise the BBC for not adopting an "open source" (html5) ....when along comes a new "owner" of the "open source company" comes along & starts suing people over useage of "their" stuff.
Now who in their right minds would touch "open source" with a barge pole?
By mikeos on 26 Aug 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement
