UPDATE: US authorities ban Intel from "using threats"
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 4 Aug 2010 at 16:40
Intel has reached a settlement with an American regulator over claims it paid off PC manufacturers to use its chips exclusively.
As expected, the US Federal Trade Commission hasn't fined Intel, but instead banned the chip maker from "using threats, bundled prices, or other offers to exclude or hamper competition or otherwise unreasonably inhibit the sale of competitive CPUs or GPUs".
Everyone gets a greater degree of certainty about the rules of the road going forward
Intel was also told to change its intellectual property agreements with AMD, Nvidia and Via, so the rival firms can consider mergers or start up joint ventures without threat of being sued by the chip giant over patent infringement.
The FTC is also requiring Intel to tell software developers that its compilers "may not register all the features of non-Intel chips", making rival products run software slower than Intel's own. The firm has set up a $100 million fund to reimburse software makers if they want to recompile their code.
“By accepting this settlement, we open the door to competition today and address Intel’s anticompetitive conduct in a way that may not have been available in a final judgment years from now," said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz. "Everyone, including Intel, gets a greater degree of certainty about the rules of the road going forward, which allows all the companies in this dynamic industry to move ahead and build better, more innovative products.”
Intel stressed that the settlement means it has not admitted any guilt.
"This agreement provides a framework that will allow us to continue to compete and to provide our customers the best possible products at the best prices," said Doug Melamed, Intel senior vice president and general counsel. "The settlement enables us to put an end to the expense and distraction of the FTC litigation."
Intel was previously fined $1.4 billion by the EU and paid out £1.25 billion to AMD.
While those cases focused on Intel shutting out AMD in particular, the FTC had also accused Intel of taking a similar tactic with graphics processors, aiming to "preserve its CPU monopoly by smothering potential competition from GPU chips such as those made by Nvidia."
Dell paid a settlement of $100 million to the US Security and Exchange Commission in regards to Intel's excluisivity payments, which at one point made up 76% of its operating income.
Any settlement that does not include a punitive fine is essentially toothless -aka Ofcom-esque!
Intel has made $10B's out of a monopoly position -their retained profits give them a capital base which continues to prevent fair competition from AMD, Nvidia and VIA -to name but a few.
By milliganp on 4 Aug 2010
I think asking Otellini to write a 100 times "I shall be fair" would be more effective...
By Olivier on 5 Aug 2010
- Switching from iPhone to Android: what I miss, what I don't
- Tech City: Easy to score when you move the goalposts
- How to remove SkyDrive from the Windows 8.1 Explorer
- Switching from iPhone to Android? Switch off iMessage
- Why is Google pumping more money into Firefox?
- Sky Broadband Shield review
- Samsung Galaxy S4: how to double your battery life
- Motorola Moto G review: first look
- IBM Watson meets Willy Wonka
- Google’s support policies shove users towards Chrome
- The importance of load balancing
- Windows Phone App Studio: an easy way to create your first Windows Phone 8 app
- The end of Windows XP support: what it really means for businesses
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Using Buffer to manage your social media
- Microsoft needs its own Steve Jobs
- Forget credit cards: hackers want your Facebook account
- Can't get fast enough broadband? Here's what to do
- Leap Motion and the battle against UI stagnation
- How to build a really bad network