UPDATE: US authorities ban Intel from "using threats"
By Nicole Kobie
Posted on 4 Aug 2010 at 16:40
Intel has reached a settlement with an American regulator over claims it paid off PC manufacturers to use its chips exclusively.
As expected, the US Federal Trade Commission hasn't fined Intel, but instead banned the chip maker from "using threats, bundled prices, or other offers to exclude or hamper competition or otherwise unreasonably inhibit the sale of competitive CPUs or GPUs".
Everyone gets a greater degree of certainty about the rules of the road going forward
Intel was also told to change its intellectual property agreements with AMD, Nvidia and Via, so the rival firms can consider mergers or start up joint ventures without threat of being sued by the chip giant over patent infringement.
The FTC is also requiring Intel to tell software developers that its compilers "may not register all the features of non-Intel chips", making rival products run software slower than Intel's own. The firm has set up a $100 million fund to reimburse software makers if they want to recompile their code.
“By accepting this settlement, we open the door to competition today and address Intel’s anticompetitive conduct in a way that may not have been available in a final judgment years from now," said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz. "Everyone, including Intel, gets a greater degree of certainty about the rules of the road going forward, which allows all the companies in this dynamic industry to move ahead and build better, more innovative products.”
Intel stressed that the settlement means it has not admitted any guilt.
"This agreement provides a framework that will allow us to continue to compete and to provide our customers the best possible products at the best prices," said Doug Melamed, Intel senior vice president and general counsel. "The settlement enables us to put an end to the expense and distraction of the FTC litigation."
Intel was previously fined $1.4 billion by the EU and paid out £1.25 billion to AMD.
While those cases focused on Intel shutting out AMD in particular, the FTC had also accused Intel of taking a similar tactic with graphics processors, aiming to "preserve its CPU monopoly by smothering potential competition from GPU chips such as those made by Nvidia."
Dell paid a settlement of $100 million to the US Security and Exchange Commission in regards to Intel's excluisivity payments, which at one point made up 76% of its operating income.
Any settlement that does not include a punitive fine is essentially toothless -aka Ofcom-esque!
Intel has made $10B's out of a monopoly position -their retained profits give them a capital base which continues to prevent fair competition from AMD, Nvidia and VIA -to name but a few.
By milliganp on 4 Aug 2010
I think asking Otellini to write a 100 times "I shall be fair" would be more effective...
By Olivier on 5 Aug 2010
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- Google Now draining iPhone battery
- The government website that doesn't work with IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Macs or smartphones
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Turn your tablet into a Sky+ remote control
- How to measure the success of a new IT system
- Three years on: the state of the tablet market
- Windows 8: what works and what doesn't
- Yes, I write down my passwords
- How to make money from apps
- Hack your own radio transmitter