EU wants UK to get tough on data protection
Posted on 24 Jun 2010 at 15:52
The UK must toughen up when it comes to data protection and give more powers to the Information Commissioner, the European Commission has said.
The UK's data protection isn't strong enough to meet EU rules, as the ICO can't perform spot checks on organisations holding personal data and can only impose penalties under certain circumstances.
Having a watchdog with insufficient powers is like keeping your guard dog tied up in the basement
"Data protection authorities have the crucial and delicate task of protecting the fundamental right to privacy. EU rules require that the work of data protection authorities must not be unbalanced by the slightest hint of legal ambiguity. I will enforce this vigorously," said Viviane Reding, Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship.
"I urge the UK to change its rules swiftly so that the data protection authority is able to perform its duties with absolute clarity about the rules," she said. "Having a watchdog with insufficient powers is like keeping your guard dog tied up in the basement."
The EU also noted that UK courts can "refuse the right to have personal data rectified or erased," and doesn't compensate "moral damage" in data cases - courts only award payouts for proven financial damages.
An ICO spokesperson told PC Pro: "It is important that we have effective data protection regulation to help protect individuals' personal information. We look forward to discussing the Commission's detailed concerns with the Ministry of Justice and providing input into the UK Government's response."
Welcoming the EU's action, Jim Killock, the executive director of the Open Rights Group, said: "Data protection in the UK is weaker than it should be. Powers to fine and inspect private companies are vital."
"The new government has a great chance to strengthen UK law and make good on the coalition's desire to protect our citizen's privacy," he added.
The UK has two months to respond, but if the EU isn't satisfied with the response, it could take the UK to court.
I was on the EU's side up until the last sentence "if the EU isn't satisfied with the response, it could take the UK to court."
Technically (although obviously not in reality) the British public has voted for what it thinks is the right level of protection. I disagree with them, but thats life.
Who are the EU to force us to adopt their policies unless it affects other EU citizens? And what compulsion is there for us to pay any fine?!
By davidsoap on 25 Jun 2010
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office