HP buys Palm for $1.2 billion
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 29 Apr 2010 at 09:10
HP has bought Palm for $1.2 billion, as the PC maker stages a dramatic entry into the smartphone market.
The company intends to extend Palm's webOS operating system across a range of devices, which may include slates. While HP said it will continue to support Windows Mobile on its iPaq devices, buying webOS will allow the company to more tightly integrate the hardware and software.
PC companies don't need mobile phone type margins to make the model work, they can be much more price-aggressive
"Palm possesses significant IP assets and has a highly skilled team," said Todd Bradley, executive vice president of HP's Personal Systems Group.
"The smartphone market is large, profitable and rapidly growing, and companies that can provide an integrated device and experience command a higher share. Advances in mobility are offering significant opportunities, and HP intends to be a leader in this market.”
At a stroke the deal puts Palm in a position to battle with the smartphone market's big hitters, and breathes new life into a company which had the wind knocked out of it by poor quarterly results.
HP has confirmed that Jon Rubinstein will continue as chief executive of Palm, which will now exist as a wholly owned subsidiary of HP.
"We're thrilled by HP's vote of confidence in Palm's technological leadership," said Rubinstein. "HP's long-standing culture of innovation, scale and global operating resources make it the perfect partner to rapidly accelerate the growth of webOS."
Tough sell
The deal has been approved by both boards and is expected to close by the end of July. Analysts have claimed it will prove good news for consumers.
"PC companies don't need mobile phone type margins to make the model work, they can be much more price-aggressive in capturing share and will certainly drive margins down for everyone else," said Avi Cohen at Avian Securities.
However, experts have warned that merely buying a handset maker is no guarantee of success, even for a company as large as HP: "WebOS could indeed become a major asset for HP and obviously has scope for use on devices such as tablets," said Tony Cripps, principal analyst at Ovum.
"However, HP will need to drive traction for WebOS among developers, if it is to truly capitalise on that potential. That may not prove easy –application writers show an overwhelming desire to support three or perhaps four device platforms.
With at least that many already dominating the space, HP may have its work cut out proving the revenue earning potential of WebOS devices to developers," he concluded.
From around the web
I suspect this is a typo from a badly faxed document, and that rather than $1.2B, HP actually bid $1.28.
By PaulOckenden on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
What do you mean?
Do you mean HP bid one dollar and 28 cents, or one point twentyeight billion?
By rjd83 on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
What do you mean?
Do you mean HP bid one dollar and 28 cents, or one point twentyeight billion?
By rjd83 on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
WebOS is nice
Well I've always thought WebOS was really nice.
If Palm can now produce a properly slick bit of hardware (basic form I thought was great) then it'll be an interesting option.
By Grunthos on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
Despite the surprisingly high price, I am actually looking forward to a proper company getting involved. With HP's economies and WebOS I think they might be able to challenge the (eurgh) iPad.
By The_Scrote on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
A Serious Android opponent
Perhaps HP were not happy to have Google dominate the devices market. I presume webOS can be made to run on a tablet and I guess PAlm have lots of patents on this type of device (which seem necessary to keep Apple and Microsoft at bay).
By milliganp on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
It could be huge news. The largest computer maker in the world now has it's own OS. They can bring out tablets based on this as well as phones.
By TimoGunt on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
webOS: a game changer <--sarcasm
The future is not another minority operating system poorly supported by developers. Bad move, HP.
By Mark_Thompson on 29 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
