Microsoft backs Web Open Font format
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 21 Apr 2010 at 09:18
Microsoft has thrown its weight behind the Web Open Font Format, bringing the promise of rich typography on the web a step closer to realisation.
As it stands designers are limited in the fonts they can use on webpages by the fact that the same font must be installed on the visiting machine.
This restricts designers to using a number of widely distributed fonts, or, alternatively, using images instead of text which brings a number of problems, including the fact that this "text" is invisible to search engines.
CSS allows different font files to be used in a page, but the major browsers all support a different range of font technologies. The Web Open Font Format aims to get around this problem by converting TrueType/OpenType/Open Font files to the WOFF format for web use.
Once decoded by the visiting machine the WOFF font should display identically to the original font from which it was created. Of course, in order to make this technique make WOFF compresses the font data, ensuring it doesn't significantly slow page loads, and supports the inclusion of metadata specifying type designer and licensing information - which should pacify the foundries wary of giving away their fonts away for free.
The Web Open Font Format has already been backed by Mozilla and a number of font foundries, but Internet Explorer's continuing dominance means that Microsoft's support remains essential if the technology is to take off.
There's no word on whether IE9 will support WOFF, but Microsoft has been making increasing efforts to support new Web standards - including elements of HTML 5.
From around the web
Oh sugar
So how long before I'm forced to read websites contructed in Comic Sans and Curlz?
What's the download time on a full Open Type font in WOFF?
Good news if used sensibly.
By Gindylow on 22 Apr 2010 ![]()
That is exactly not what will happen
Comic Sans and Curlz are already widely distributed fonts. They are not used in the majority of websites for other reasons that technical impossibility.
What you're going to see is things like Sabon or Calluna replacing Times New Roman. We might also see Din or even Helvetica (common on Mac, less common on Windows/Linux) start to replace Arial some of the time.
By steviesteveo on 22 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement
