Google: one in four countries block our services
By Hani Megerisi
Posted on 20 Apr 2010 at 12:59
Google claims 25 of the 100 countries where it offers services block its products in one form or another.
While the firm admitted countries such as China represented the “most polarising example” of internet restrictions, it also named several European and democratic nations that restrict content.
“Our policy is to comply with the laws of these democratic governments - for example, those that make pro-Nazi material illegal in Germany and France - and remove search results from only our local search engine,” said Rachel Whetstone, vice president of global communications and public affairs at Google, in a post on the company’s European Public Policy blog.
Whenever we do remove content, we display a message for our users that X number of results have been removed to comply with local law
“We also comply with youth protection laws in countries like Germany by removing links to certain material that is deemed inappropriate for children or by enabling Safe Search by default, as we do in Korea. Whenever we do remove content, we display a message for our users that X number of results have been removed to comply with local law.”
Whetstone added that all sites blocked by Google were reported to the chillingeffects.org project, run by a coalition of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and a number of US universities, including Harvard, Stanford and Berkeley, which tracks online restrictions around the world.
The information reported to the site ranges from videos on Turkish YouTube that insult the country’s founder Mustafa Ataturk (which is illegal in Turkey) to cease and desist notices in the USA for links to copyrighted material.
Google said it was revealing these figures due to the large rise in internet censorship around the world. It highlighted recent statistics from the Open Net Initiative, which claims the number of countries censoring the internet has risen from four in 2002 to 40 in 2010, with nations such as China and Saudi Arabia being the worst offenders.
Only to be expected
Censorship is nothing new, the only thing different here is the media to which it's applied.
Governments have always tried to treat their populations like mushrooms for various reasons (either for good, bad or indifferent reasons - depending on your view)and something that can bypass all previous filtering systems
- having the citizens/subjects/people of different counties/cultures/ideologies/political divisions actually talking directly to each other, on mass
- how could it go on being allowed?
By greemble on 20 Apr 2010
- Huawei Ascend P6 review: first look
- Adobe Illustrator CC review: first look
- Let MPs tell us what they really want ISPs to block
- Adobe Photoshop CC review: first look
- WWDC 2013 and iOS 7 launch: live blog
- Sony VAIO Pro review: first look
- Want child porn blocked? Meet the IWF
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Facebook "click on the photo" scams: how they work
- Three alternatives to Word's spelling and grammar checker
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Microsoft Office and the death of upgrades
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts