Skip to navigation
Latest News

Village pays for its own fibre broadband network

Countryside

By Martin James

Posted on 14 Apr 2010 at 11:30

A Midlands village that was told a high-speed broadband fibre network would be “impractical” to install has responded in a novel fashion – it has done the job itself.

Residents of Lyddington in Rutland, Leicestershire were among the 2.5 million homes in the UK currently denied broadband speeds of even 2Mbits/sec because of network infrastructure issues. And with BT having decided that installing fibre-optic lines in the area wouldn't be cost effective, the village's residents took matters into their own hands.

The Rutland Telecom scheme, a joint venture between the local firm reselling BT's broadband and Lyddington's residents, raised £37,000 and set up its own network.

We found that any company could do, on a smaller scale, what Carphone Warehouse has done and take over BT's network

“As a local IT company we were constantly getting enquiries about high-speed broadband and decided to see how this could be provided,” Rutland Telecom's managing director, Dr David Lewis, told the BBC. "We found that any company could do, on a smaller scale, what Carphone Warehouse has done and take over BT's network... we could utilise parts of BT's existing infrastructure and supply next-generation broadband services via community-funded projects.

“Rutland Telecom is now delighted to have developed the first UK Fibre-to-the-Cabinet broadband offering in a rural location, bringing a unique service to an otherwise technologically-impoverished community.”

The process still required the involvement of BT to supply fibre-optic cable to a street cabinet in the village, a process that took two years and required the intervention of telecoms regulator Ofcom.

Now, from not even getting 2Mbits/sec, the 50 homes that have thus far signed up are now basking in connection speeds of up to 40Mbits/sec. Rutland Telecom is charging £30 per month for line rental, broadband and all UK phone calls, and says it should be able to pay back its investors in a few years.

BT said it had been delighted to help Rutland Telecom, though it did urge the firm to make the network available to other service providers to avoid a “local monopoly” – though Rutland Telecom will no doubt argue that given it was the only party willing to take action in the first place, a monopoly was hard to avoid.

The firm says it has already been approached by 40 other rural community groups to help assess whether a similar solution is possible in their area, with projects in Leicestershire and Wales reportedly close to being launched.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Intervention of Ofcom

It would be interesting to know of Ofcom's role -did it help or hinder and will the next attempt take less than 2 years?

By milliganp on 14 Apr 2010

Idoesn't sound like

BT were that delighted to help if Ofcom had to get on their case as is implied here.

BT obstructive monopoly. Surely not!

By kaneclem on 14 Apr 2010

Why offer golden pipes?

When you can sell old rope for a profit?

BT has zero incentive to spend anything on fibre anywhere. All it has to do is (barely) maintain its copper network and keep collecting the rent.

The worthless Digital Econcomy Bill (or music studio enrichment law) does nothing to set a timescale for fibre to the home, or anywhere else.

By cheysuli on 14 Apr 2010

Bloody cheek!

"...though it did urge the firm to make the network available to other service providers to avoid a “local monopoly” ".

What, kind of like the one that BT was enjoying there?

"Well done for installing the fibre 'cos we couldn't be ar**d to - now please let everyone else use it too, thanks."
Eff off.

Sigh, I sometimes think this is what I'm going to have to do to get a decent speed here too.

By mviracca on 14 Apr 2010

the number stack up

surely its worth bt doing this for rural areas. with only 50 homes at £30 per month thats £18,000 per year, easily paying back the £37,000 investment in little over two years, seems like good sense to me. if i had a spare £37,000 i would quite happily invest in one of these schemes if it was gonna pay or itself in two years. cant see bts problem. get 100 users and its done in a year !!

By baileytech on 14 Apr 2010

There a number of towns in the USA that have resorted to this too. It tends to get the local ISP to charge into battle with vast rollouts of fibre pretty much immediately. Sometimes they even sue the town to get them to stop. I hope BT won't follow that route.

By steviesteveo on 14 Apr 2010

Rutland is a county

The article should probably read, “Residents of Lyddington in Rutland, near Leicestershire, were among…”

By pacid on 15 Apr 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.