Village pays for its own fibre broadband network
By Martin James
Posted on 14 Apr 2010 at 11:30
A Midlands village that was told a high-speed broadband fibre network would be “impractical” to install has responded in a novel fashion – it has done the job itself.
Residents of Lyddington in Rutland, Leicestershire were among the 2.5 million homes in the UK currently denied broadband speeds of even 2Mbits/sec because of network infrastructure issues. And with BT having decided that installing fibre-optic lines in the area wouldn't be cost effective, the village's residents took matters into their own hands.
The Rutland Telecom scheme, a joint venture between the local firm reselling BT's broadband and Lyddington's residents, raised £37,000 and set up its own network.
We found that any company could do, on a smaller scale, what Carphone Warehouse has done and take over BT's network
“As a local IT company we were constantly getting enquiries about high-speed broadband and decided to see how this could be provided,” Rutland Telecom's managing director, Dr David Lewis, told the BBC. "We found that any company could do, on a smaller scale, what Carphone Warehouse has done and take over BT's network... we could utilise parts of BT's existing infrastructure and supply next-generation broadband services via community-funded projects.
“Rutland Telecom is now delighted to have developed the first UK Fibre-to-the-Cabinet broadband offering in a rural location, bringing a unique service to an otherwise technologically-impoverished community.”
The process still required the involvement of BT to supply fibre-optic cable to a street cabinet in the village, a process that took two years and required the intervention of telecoms regulator Ofcom.
Now, from not even getting 2Mbits/sec, the 50 homes that have thus far signed up are now basking in connection speeds of up to 40Mbits/sec. Rutland Telecom is charging £30 per month for line rental, broadband and all UK phone calls, and says it should be able to pay back its investors in a few years.
BT said it had been delighted to help Rutland Telecom, though it did urge the firm to make the network available to other service providers to avoid a “local monopoly” – though Rutland Telecom will no doubt argue that given it was the only party willing to take action in the first place, a monopoly was hard to avoid.
The firm says it has already been approached by 40 other rural community groups to help assess whether a similar solution is possible in their area, with projects in Leicestershire and Wales reportedly close to being launched.
From around the web
Intervention of Ofcom
It would be interesting to know of Ofcom's role -did it help or hinder and will the next attempt take less than 2 years?
By milliganp on 14 Apr 2010 ![]()
Idoesn't sound like
BT were that delighted to help if Ofcom had to get on their case as is implied here.
BT obstructive monopoly. Surely not!
By kaneclem on 14 Apr 2010 ![]()
Why offer golden pipes?
When you can sell old rope for a profit?
BT has zero incentive to spend anything on fibre anywhere. All it has to do is (barely) maintain its copper network and keep collecting the rent.
The worthless Digital Econcomy Bill (or music studio enrichment law) does nothing to set a timescale for fibre to the home, or anywhere else.
By cheysuli on 14 Apr 2010 ![]()
Bloody cheek!
"...though it did urge the firm to make the network available to other service providers to avoid a “local monopoly” ".
What, kind of like the one that BT was enjoying there?
"Well done for installing the fibre 'cos we couldn't be ar**d to - now please let everyone else use it too, thanks."
Eff off.
Sigh, I sometimes think this is what I'm going to have to do to get a decent speed here too.
By mviracca on 14 Apr 2010 ![]()
the number stack up
surely its worth bt doing this for rural areas. with only 50 homes at £30 per month thats £18,000 per year, easily paying back the £37,000 investment in little over two years, seems like good sense to me. if i had a spare £37,000 i would quite happily invest in one of these schemes if it was gonna pay or itself in two years. cant see bts problem. get 100 users and its done in a year !!
By baileytech on 14 Apr 2010 ![]()
There a number of towns in the USA that have resorted to this too. It tends to get the local ISP to charge into battle with vast rollouts of fibre pretty much immediately. Sometimes they even sue the town to get them to stop. I hope BT won't follow that route.
By steviesteveo on 14 Apr 2010 ![]()
Rutland is a county
The article should probably read, “Residents of Lyddington in Rutland, near Leicestershire, were among…”
By pacid on 15 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement
