Skip to navigation
Latest News

Google opens fire on Digital Economy Bill

Businessman

By Hani Megerisi

Posted on 8 Apr 2010 at 15:29

Google has hit out against the controversial Clause 8 in the Digital Economy Bill, claiming it "has escaped proper scrutiny."

Clause 8 grants the secretary of state for business the power to block "a location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright"

Unsurprisingly, the clause has ruffled Google's feathers. “The proposals to introduce website blocking - now included in Clause 8 - have escaped proper scrutiny. They were introduced 24 hours before a crucial vote in the House of Lords, without a full debate over whether such a policy is right in principle.”

“We absolutely believe in the importance of copyright, but blocking through injunction creates a high risk that legal content gets mistakenly blocked, or that people abuse the system,” it concluded.

Google was highlighted during the debate by Liberal Democrat MP Don Foster, who noted that the search engine could fall foul of Clause 8's wide ranging powers.

TalkTalk slams “draconian” bill

TalkTalk has also hit out against the bill, pledging to “continue to battle against these oppressive proposals”.

“Many draconian proposals remain such as the responsibility on customers to protect their home networks from hacking at a collective cost of hundreds of millions of pounds a year, the presumption that they are guilty unless they can prove themselves innocent and, as in China, the potential for legitimate search engines and websites to be blocked,” said Andrew Heaney, executive director of Strategy and Regulation at TalkTalk, who has led the firm's charge against the bill.

He also attacked the influence that “big music and film companies” had over the bill, and the “absence of any proper debate or scrutiny by MPs”.

The firm has pledged to continue its fight against the bill after the general election.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Are you sure?

Clause 8 deals with ISPs requirements to warn alleged file sharers. I think Google means Clause 18, which has been withdrawn: http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-digital-econo
my-bill-quick-guide-to-all-45-measures/

By SAughton on 8 Apr 2010

Not withdrawn, replaced with a differing clause

"

‘(1)


The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about the granting by


a court of a blocking injunction in respect of a location on the internet which the


court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with


an activity that infringes copyright."

By TimoGunt on 9 Apr 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.