Google opens fire on Digital Economy Bill
By Hani Megerisi
Posted on 8 Apr 2010 at 15:29
Google has hit out against the controversial Clause 8 in the Digital Economy Bill, claiming it "has escaped proper scrutiny."
Clause 8 grants the secretary of state for business the power to block "a location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright"
Unsurprisingly, the clause has ruffled Google's feathers. “The proposals to introduce website blocking - now included in Clause 8 - have escaped proper scrutiny. They were introduced 24 hours before a crucial vote in the House of Lords, without a full debate over whether such a policy is right in principle.”
“We absolutely believe in the importance of copyright, but blocking through injunction creates a high risk that legal content gets mistakenly blocked, or that people abuse the system,” it concluded.
Google was highlighted during the debate by Liberal Democrat MP Don Foster, who noted that the search engine could fall foul of Clause 8's wide ranging powers.
TalkTalk slams “draconian” bill
TalkTalk has also hit out against the bill, pledging to “continue to battle against these oppressive proposals”.
“Many draconian proposals remain such as the responsibility on customers to protect their home networks from hacking at a collective cost of hundreds of millions of pounds a year, the presumption that they are guilty unless they can prove themselves innocent and, as in China, the potential for legitimate search engines and websites to be blocked,” said Andrew Heaney, executive director of Strategy and Regulation at TalkTalk, who has led the firm's charge against the bill.
He also attacked the influence that “big music and film companies” had over the bill, and the “absence of any proper debate or scrutiny by MPs”.
The firm has pledged to continue its fight against the bill after the general election.
From around the web
Are you sure?
Clause 8 deals with ISPs requirements to warn alleged file sharers. I think Google means Clause 18, which has been withdrawn: http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-digital-econo
my-bill-quick-guide-to-all-45-measures/
By SAughton on 8 Apr 2010 ![]()
Not withdrawn, replaced with a differing clause
"
‘(1)
The Secretary of State may by regulations make provision about the granting by
a court of a blocking injunction in respect of a location on the internet which the
court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with
an activity that infringes copyright."
By TimoGunt on 9 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
