Times websites to start charging from June
By Hani Megerisi
Posted on 26 Mar 2010 at 10:45
The Times and The Sunday Times will start charging for web content from June.
They will charge either £1 a day (the same as the daily cover price of The Times) or a subscription of £2 a week for access to both titles' websites. Readers who pay for subscriptions to the print newspapers will get free access to the websites.
The publications will launch two separate new sites in early May, replacing the existing Times Online.
We do believe we have unique content and people will pay for quality journalism
The move represents a brave experiment for the Murdoch-owned titles, which will become the first mainstream national newspapers to throw up a paywall. The Financial Times charges readers for access to its website, as does the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, although both clearly specialise in financial news rather than the more general interest content of the Times newspapers.
Nevertheless, the company remains confident readers will be willing to stump up. "We do believe we have unique content and people will pay for quality journalism,” said a spokesperson for The Times' parent company, News International.
She added the firm’s other UK titles – The Sun and The News of the World – would follow suit, but said they “haven’t made any commitment as to when”.
News Corp’s CEO Rupert Murdoch has been waging a long-running campaign against news aggregators such as Google News, accusing them of profiting from news without contributing to the costs of journalism. A report in the New York Times earlier this month suggested Murdoch was ready to sue Google over the indexing of its content.
From around the web
Hurray!
As a daily user of Google News it means I will not be able to read the Rupert Murdoch view of the world. Oh dear, never mind!
By BidAuto on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
"Brave experiment.."
..or the roar of a dinosaur who doesn't really 'get' the internet?
It'll be interesting to see how this pans out but I suspect it'll not go the way Murdoch wants it to go. I hope it doesn't, anyway.
By Mr_Flynn on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
As Mr_Flynn says, it will be interesting to see. It'll either flop and the number of visitors will slump drastically, or it'll turn out to be a viable business and everyone else will jump on board. Hopefully they will at least get rid of all their pop-out adverts (although PC Pro could do with getting rid of theirs that cover the article text until clicked on and opened - I digress...)
Although the Google indexing issue appeared to show that they didn't "get" the internet, by not realising it was simply an additional link into their site rather than a rip-off of their content, they clearly understand business.
However, the fact that the BBC is unlikely to start charging licence payers more money to access its online content must be a factor. Is the Times's news really worth paying £100/year over the BBC's?
By halsteadk on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
Soon to follow..
Rupert's campaign to have "pirate" news websites closed, where evil journalists publish information without charging (ie. paying him), devaluing the price of news.
Tell someone something now! Be a "news pirate" today!
By cheysuli on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
Once again we have a breach of the Trades Descriptions Act by calling Murdoch's output "quality journalism".
No doubt some people with more money than sense will pay but hopefully most won't and the whole enterprise will collapse as it deserves too.
The web was built on the idea of sharing information, and not for the benefit of grasping old men who still think they can control information!
By omnisvalidus on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
The great thing about the new on the Internet is that I can read only what is of any interest for me and as much as I have time for. That's why I don't buy newspapers. To pay a full price of a paper just for the privilege of reading one or two articles is hardly alluring.
But WE know it already and HE doesn't give a monkey so I've just realised that this comment is completely unnecessary :)
By Josefov on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
Price of paper?
Once again the electronic pricing bears no resemblance to the cost of distribution & materials.
Although the weekly subscription is getting something like reasonable - still too much for the Murdoch press, in my mind though
By greemble on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
Made me giggle....
...as if anyone is going to pay £1 per day to access Times Online when all the news they carry is available free elsewhere. Murdoch has truly lost the plot!
By everton2004 on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
see ya
Times pay wall. Hmmmm let me see: Have you READ the Times or Sunday Times recently? Quality of content has literally fallen off a cliff in the last 5 years. Great time to start charging. My FT online sub including ePaper costs less despite its unique content and £2 cover price, and BBC News will always be free. The distinctly 20th Century Mr Murdoch's lack of use of the internet (or even email till recently) has finally destroyed this once great newspaper. Hopefully he'll sell it. Times Knights required!
By gavmeister on 26 Mar 2010 ![]()
Format Change
In my opinion the internet experience on a PC is not terribly good for reading longer articles (cue iPad!) and summary news is well covered by the BBC and the like. However for eBook or similar experience I would pay for a quality newspaper (i.e. Not anything Murdoch).
By milliganp on 27 Mar 2010 ![]()
They plan for The Sun to start charging?
"We do believe we have unique content and people will pay for quality journalism”
So why would people pay to read The Sun? Ah, it's the unique content - nowhere else on the internet can you find pictures of tits.
By Mark_Thompson on 27 Mar 2010 ![]()
BreakthePaywall
BreakthePaywall! is a free add-on for Internet Explorer (Firefox coming soon!) that simplifies using the various methods for circumventing website paywall restrictions.
By BreakthePaywall on 9 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
