Google wins battle over "counterfeit" Ad Words
By Barry Collins
Posted on 23 Mar 2010 at 13:58
Google has won a lengthy court battle with three French companies over the sale of "counterfeit" advertising keywords.
Luxury goods maker Louis Vuitton and two other companies were suing the search giant for allowing rivals to buy their names as advertising keywords. The companies argued this would allow counterfeit goods makers to profit from their brand name.
However, the European Court of Justice sided with the search engine, ruling that the sale of Ad Words didn't infringe the companies' trademarks.
"Some companies want to limit choice for users by extending trademark law to encompass the use of keywords in online advertising," Google's senior litigation counsel, Dr. Harjinder S Obhi, writes in a post on Google's European Public Policy blog. "Ultimately they want to be able to exercise greater control over the information available to users by preventing other companies from advertising when a user enters their trademark as a search query."
Google denied it was encouraging the trade in fake goods. "Contrary to what some are intimating, this case is not about us arguing for a right to advertise counterfeit goods," Obhi writes. "We have strict policies that forbid the advertising of counterfeit goods; it's a bad user experience. We work collaboratively with brand owners to better identify and deal with counterfeiters."
However, in a potential warning shot to the search firm, the court did rule that "whenever there is a risk of [consumer] confusion, there will always be a trademark infringement," suggesting that Google will have to take great care to ensure trademarked Ad Words are not misused.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
