Palm "deeply disappointed" by financial results
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 19 Mar 2010 at 09:06
Palm has proclaimed itself "deeply disappointed" with its third quarter financial results, despite losses narrowing significantly.
The smartphone maker recorded a net loss of $22 million in the third quarter, which looks positively festive compared to the $98 million it lost in the same period last year.
Revenues of $349.9 million were also above the company's estimates of between $300 million and $320 million.
If we could have launched at Verizon prior to the Droid, I think we would have gotten the attention the Droid got. And since I believe we have a better product, I think we could have even done better
However, while Palm shipped 960,000 smartphones to partners in the third quarter, only 408,000 of those were sold to customers, leaving stockpiles of Pre and Pixi handsets in warehouses.
As a result, the company predicts that fourth quarter earning are likely to level out at around $150 million - less than half of what had been expected by Wall Street.
"Our recent underperformance has been extremely disappointing to me personally," said Jon Rubinstein, Palm's chief executive.
"If we could have launched at Verizon prior to the Droid, I think we would have gotten the attention the Droid got. And since I believe we have a better product, I think we could have even done better," he added.
From around the web
The Pre better than the Droid? I think not.
Slightly over optimistic goals for a rather mediocre handset.
By Deano on 19 Mar 2010 ![]()
Whilst the keyboard is poor I like the handset and think the OS is the best of the current crop. But there is no way I'm going to invest in one. It looks very much like Palms last attempt to make it in the handset business is over. Lets hope they can license the OS to Microsoft. It's got to be better than the car crash that Windows Phone 7 Series is turning into.
By Bassey1976 on 19 Mar 2010 ![]()
I've always liked Palm and I especially like the way their Web OS works so it's a shame to see them failing.
Perhaps they would have been better off licensing the OS to third party manufacturers like MS are.
@Bassey1976 I may be wrong, but Windows Phone 7 doesn't look like a car crash to me, looks like the most innovative of all the smartphone OSes. Windows Mobile, now there was a car crash.
By Grunthos on 19 Mar 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement
