Skip to navigation
Latest News

Jury piles further patent misery on Microsoft

Legal

By Stuart Turton

Posted on 17 Mar 2010 at 11:40

Microsoft has been slapped with a $106 million fine for infringing two patents held by VirnetX Holding Corporation.

A US federal jury in Texas ordered Microsoft to pay VirnetX $71.75 million for infringing a virtual private network patent, and a further $34 million for violating a patent covering the creation of a secure domain name service.

We hope this decision sends a clear message to patent infringers everywhere that they will be held responsible for wrongly profiting off the hard work of others

According to McKool Smith, the law firm which represented VirnetX, those fines could be tripled by a judge, as the jury found that Microsoft "wilfully" violated the patents.

"Our clients are very happy with today's verdict," said McKool Smith lawyer Douglas Cawley. "We hope this decision sends a clear message to patent infringers everywhere that they will be held responsible for wrongly profiting off the hard work of others."

Microsoft claimed it was readying an appeal. "We are disappointed by the jury's verdict," said Kevin Kutz, director of public affairs at Microsoft.

"We respect others' intellectual property, and we believe the evidence demonstrated that we do not infringe and the patents are invalid. We believe the award of damages is legally and factually unsupported, so we will ask the court to overturn the verdict," he added.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Very Happy? No kidding!

"Our clients are very happy with today's verdict,"

I bet they are. $106million!

I wonder if there is something I can sue MS for, it's clearly the fashionable way to make money these days.

By Grunthos on 17 Mar 2010

This is the usual crap Patent system in the States. There are numerous write-ups regarding their (patented) method from year earlier.
A very quick search found references back as far as 1993, and that itself refers to an earlier discussion!

By Ex_Sailor on 17 Mar 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.