Digg removes logins and brings back leaderboards
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 15 Mar 2010 at 10:19
Digg is planning a significant overhaul that will remove the need for users to login to recommend web pages to the site.
The changes were introduced at the South by Southwest Interactive (SXSWi), and represent "five years of significant work" according to chief executive Jay Adelson.
Perhaps the biggest change is that users will no longer need to log into the service to Digg something, with Adelson predicting that this could bolster the number of submissions from "20,000 a day to millions a day".
I should be able to send a predictable amount of traffic to those sort of smaller and medium-tier sites
Other significant changes include a "one-click" submission process, and personalised homepages for users that show content based on their interests.
"It's going to be a pretty radical set of changes," said Adelson. "If you think about Digg right now, if you put a Digg button on a page it's kind of like gambling in that if you hit, you hit big. But if you don't hit, there's not a lot of value.
"We're trying to address that as a tool. I should be able to send a predictable amount of traffic to those sort of smaller and medium-tier sites," he concluded.
Behind the scenes, Adelson claimed that Digg was trading in MySQL for an infrastructure that will be "very, very fast," though he offered no further information on the technology that would be used.
Adelson also confirmed that leaderboards rewarding the service's top diggers would be reintroduced. The feature has been trialled before, but proved so unpopular that it was dropped.
However, Adelson claimed it had been overhauled to prevent people from gaming the results. "You had the people actually at the top of the list telling us they didn't like the list. That's generally a good sign that a feature is broken."
Invites for the revamped service will be sent out over the next couple of weeks.
From around the web
The technology they've traded MySQL in for is Cassandra, a high-performance NoSQL database. They're in a tier of major web properties who're all collaborating on finding massive commercial applications for the technology including Mahalo and Twitter.
By littlefarny on 15 Mar 2010 ![]()
"with Adelson predicting that this could bolster the number of submissions from "20,000 a day to millions a day"."
Don't they think quality will suffer? When I first started using Digg, it was like reading a more populist version of Slashdot. Now it's like a tabloid version of tech events. Reading the comments on Digg is particularly hard-going.
In their quest for populism, are the creators of Digg going to leave behind what made it so good in the first place?
By pbryanw on 15 Mar 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement
