US mulls legal challenge to China's web censors

 

Gallery

By Reuters

Posted on 10 Mar 2010 at 08:09

The US is investigating whether it can legally challenge Chinese internet restrictions that hurt Google and other American companies operating in the country.

"We are still dialoguing not just with Google, but with other internet providers, to make sure we fully understand what is happening in China," US trade representative Ron Kirk said in remarks at the National Press Club.

At the same time, US trade officials are "trying to make our own determination whether we believe in fact this is not WTO [World Trade Organisation] compliant and if the best resolution is to go forward and file an appeal," Kirk said.

We are still dialoguing not just with Google, but with other internet providers, to make sure we fully understand what is happening in China

A case challenging censorship practices that affect Google and other internet providers who operate in China would be the first of its kind at the WTO.

A US free speech group, known as the First Amendment Coalition, had been urging such a case for years before Google threatened to leave China in January due to hacking incidents and web restrictions.

Kirk said trying to resolve the issue through bilateral forums such as the US-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) was "much more preferable than the uncertain path of what can be a two-, three-, four-year legal battle in the WTO."

US companies cannot wait that long for a solution in the current economic environment, although the States will not hesitate to go to the WTO when that is the only solution it has left, Kirk said.

Intense negotiations

Kirk noted Google and China have been in "very intense negotiations" since the company's threat to leave.

On another matter, Kirk said the US also hoped to persuade China to change "indigenous innovation" rules favoring companies that develop the intellectual property for new products in China.

The Government procurement policy is intended to spur Chinese companies to be more innovative, but the US argues it is essentially a trade barrier that does not reflect how products are developed in the global economy.

"Our objective is just to get the Government's thumb off the scale," Kirk said.