Skip to navigation
Latest News

Lords defeat clause 17, but cause chaos of their own

Britain

By Barry Collins

Posted on 4 Mar 2010 at 08:22

The Lords have voted down the Government's attempt to make arbitrary amendments to copyright law - but have rubber stamped a "dangerous" copyright amendment of their own.

The controversial part of Clause 17, which would have given ministers the right to amend copyright law without due Parliamentary process, was defeated in the House of Lords last night.

In its place, however, arrives an amendment tabled by Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers that will give courts the power to force ISPs to block access to sites accused of copyright infringement. The motion was passed by 165 to 140 votes.

The amendment, which was only tabled at the end of last week, has been branded as "dangerous" by civil liberties campaigners, who claim it swings the balance of power in favour of the copyright holders. "Individuals and small businesses would be open to massive 'copyright attacks' that could shut them down, just by the threat of action," the Open Rights Group chief executive, Jim Killock, claimed yesterday.

The amendment still has to pass through the House of Commons before being added to the final bill.

Broadband faults

Meanwhile, cross-bench peer Lord Erroll is sticking to his guns on another amendment, which demands that Ofcom establishes a scheme to deal with consumer broadband faults.

The amendment aims to eradicate the "buck-passing" between BT and ISPs when consumers report a fault on their broadband lines, and ensure that lines are repaired to an adequate standard.

The amendment was withdrawn, but will be tabled again by Lord Erroll for the third reading of the bill, which takes place next week.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

A royal can of worms

This is very bad news because the motion is just way too vague. What could also happen to sites which are used by the majority for legitimate purposes but by a minority for illegal purposes? Could I find myself blocked from such sites? What about other such sites? Technically under this legislation, they'd have the right to block sites like eBay and Google because I bet you'll be able to find some illegal and/or copyrighted material available on them somewhere.

By Trippynet on 4 Mar 2010

Idiotic

That is all.

By Mr_Flynn on 4 Mar 2010

Look at the positives...

Better the courts than the politicians, and certainly better than the Secretary of State being able to do whatever he wants.

By SwissMac on 4 Mar 2010

Blocking Ebay

Publishers,whether of dvd movies or games, hate reselling. EA and Activision will have Ebay pulling sales of second hand games before the ink is dry on this one.

By fingerbob69 on 4 Mar 2010

You did read that the majority of info on the site has to be infringing, not just one item. They also have to be a site that doesn't have a take-down policy plus that there are fifty letters before court action can be entertained.

By Ex_Sailor on 4 Mar 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.