Google defies Chinese censorship
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 13 Jan 2010 at 08:08
Google has vowed to stop censoring the results of its Chinese site, risking expulsion from the lucrative market by the Chinese government.
The search giant claimed it was taking the action after a year of increasingly aggressive online behaviour by the Chinese government, beginning with attacks on its servers and those of "at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses - including the internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors."
However, the company claims things swiftly took a more sinister turn, as the attacks began to target the email accounts of Chinese human rights activists and their Western supporters.
We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn
While Google was quick to reassure users that only two accounts were compromised - revealing only email creation dates and subject lines - the company claims the actions are the last straw.
"These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered - combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web - have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China," says David Drummond, Google's chief legal officer on the company's blog.
"We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognise that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China," he concludes.
The comments even prompted the US's secretary of state, Hilary Clinton, into action. "We have been briefed by Google on these allegations, which raise very serious concerns and questions. We look to the Chinese government for an explanation," she says.
"The ability to operate with confidence in cyberspace is critical in a modern society and economy. I will be giving an address next week on the centrality of internet freedom in the 21st century, and we will have further comment on this matter as the facts become clear."
Google established its Chinese site in 2006, and drew the ire of the international community for its decision to censor search results in accordance with the government's wishes. At the time, Google argued "that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results."
From around the web
Too late Google, the damage is done. The Chinese will have taken your technology and all they need from you now. So losing you will be irrelevant.
Shame you couldn't have taken this stance from the beginning, you'd have earned respect for that.
By Grunthos on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
A chance for M$ to slip in and bow down to Chinese demands :) (and then also have their code nicked :D )
By nicomo on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
I can't help but ask if this means that Google is going to take a stand against other repressive regimes that require tech companies to censor their services or to hand over details of disidents. Given that France and Germany are two of the worst offenders in the free world, and that Australia looks set to become a pretty big offender, too. I doubt it very much.
It looks like it's going to be yet another case of one rule for us and another rule for them. Google will make a big show over "fighting repression" in China because China's a big scary bogeeyman that it's OK to hate, but it will be business as usual in other countries where it is no politically correct to talk about censorship, or where censorship is swept uncder the carpet.
Still, maybe Google will shame some other companies into at least acknowledging that what they are doing is wrong.
By Perfectblue97 on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
Rather ironic given Google Boss Eric Schmidt's recent comments:
"If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place."
"it is possible that information will be made available (by Google) to the authorities"
Perhaps this calibrates Google's famous slogan: "do not be quite as evil as the Chinese Government."
And PerfectBlue97 - are you one of the Chinese Government's famous paid trolls or can you substantiate those ridiculous allegations about the French, Germans and Australians?
By JohnAHind on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
Too little, too late, but still the correct thing to do. As Grunthos said it's a shame they didn't do this from the start.
By Minou on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
Agreed this gives Google nothing but good publicity, even if they don't pull the plug and the status quo is maintained they've lost nothing.
I remember the good old days when Google was the underdog and all it waned to do was provide a quicker was of searching, these days it's run more like Microsoft with Hitler in charge!!!
By anthonysjones on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
@JohnAHind
Regarding France, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8436745.st
m should make it clear
By thewelshbrummie on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
google censorship
@JohnAHind,
Well, I would advise you to do a search for “google censorship germany” and “google censorship australia” and you will know very soon what Perfectblue97 is talking about.
By stasi47 on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
@thewelshbrummie
The BBC link to France is to a story concerning internet piracy and illegal downloading. I fail to see how this makes France a "repressive regime that requires tech companies to censor their services or to hand over details of dissidents", unless you regard illegal downloaders as dissidents or stopping the practice to be censorship.
By AdrianB on 14 Jan 2010 ![]()
JohnAHind:
Somebody obviously hasn't been listening to the news.
France and Germany are both well known Internet censors. Under post war laws all Internet companies operating in France and Germany are required to filter out any content sympathetic to the Nazi in history or contemporary times. Internet companies are also forbidden form displaying Nazi logs or selling memorabilia. Yahoo was famously sued a few years back because of this. The case was in November 2006 as I recall, but intrnet censorship goes back long before that. Fact of history.
If you don't believe me, then maybe you would belive this article for a well known British newspaper
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/in
ternet-auctioneers-ban-sale-of-nazi-items-753951.h
tml
Australia is also attempting to bring in laws requiring ISP level filtering.
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Na
tional-filter-protest-6-March/0,130061791,33930031
2,00.htm?omnRef=http://news.google.com/news?q=aust
ralia%20isp%20filter&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-G
B:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=
en&tab=wn
I'm actually an anti-censorship campaigner, so I know what I'm talking about. Unlike you, who appears to have been raised on a diet of Fox/ABC, and who thus knows very little about the real world.
Google censors its services in several big name Western democracies, including the US and UK, and unless it also acts to fight censorship in these countries then it's actions in China are next to meaningless.
I suggest that rather than making a silly little fuss you put Google to use and look up claims of censorship made against it.
By Perfectblue97 on 14 Jan 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement
