FTC sues Intel for "anticompetitive tactics"
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 16 Dec 2009 at 16:35
Intel has been sued by the US Federal Trade Commission for using "anticompetitive tactics" to "hamstring" competitors.
The FTC's allegations mirror those of the EU, which found that Intel offered the world’s largest computer manufacturers, including Dell, HP, and IBM, massive discounts in return for restricting the sale of non-Intel processors.
The watchdog accuses the chip giant of waging "a systematic campaign to shut out rivals' competing microchips by cutting off their access to the marketplace."
"This strategy has succeeded in maintaining the Intel monopoly at the expense of consumers, who have been denied access to potentially superior, non-Intel CPU chips and lower prices," the complaint states.
Intel has engaged in a deliberate campaign to hamstring competitive threats to its monopoly
“Intel has engaged in a deliberate campaign to hamstring competitive threats to its monopoly,” says Richard Feinstein, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.
“It’s been running roughshod over the principles of fair play and the laws protecting competition on the merits. The Commission’s action today seeks to remedy the damage that Intel has done to competition, innovation, and, ultimately, the American consumer.”
The FTC is also claiming that Intel has brought its anticompetitive practices to the graphics card market. "These products [GPUs] have lessened the need for CPUs, and therefore pose a threat to Intel’s monopoly power," the suit claims.
"Intel has responded to this competitive challenge by embarking on a similar anticompetitive strategy, which aims to preserve its CPU monopoly by smothering potential competition from GPU chips such as those made by Nvidia," it concludes.
The FTC is seeking an order prohibiting "Intel from using threats, bundled prices, or other offers to encourage exclusive deals, hamper competition, or unfairly manipulate the prices of its CPU or GPU chips."
Intel has called the case "misguided" and claimed its actions in the market have benefited consumers and spurred innovation.
Unsurprisingly the move has been cheered by Nvidia. "We applaud today's action by the US Federal Trade Commission," says spokesman Hector Marinez.
"We are particularly pleased to see scrutiny being placed on Intel's behavior toward GPUs, which have become an increasingly important part of the PC industry."
The investigation will come as a bitter blow for Intel, following the $1.25 billion settlement with AMD last month.
From around the web
the FTC is also claiming that they rigged the/a compiler so that software would run faster on Intel chips. Is that even possible?
By davidsoap on 17 Dec 2009 ![]()
(@davidsoap) You betcha! Because modern processors do out of order execution and predictive branching, compiler optimisation is a major issue. 10-20 years ago when there were lots of different processor chips, individual manufacturers would tweak their compilers to make benchmarks run faster. Thus MIPS, which started off meaning Millions of Instructions Per Second became know as Meaningless Industry Performance Statistic.
However I guess 90% of Windows code is compiled using Microsoft Compilers, so the issue would be -did Intel "help" Microsoft optimise their complier.
It also may be of interest (yawn!) that in Open systems based on Linux, AMD chips have tended to perform better that Intel -it's much harder to nobble open source.
By milliganp on 17 Dec 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
