Intel needs to keep an eye on ARM
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 11 Dec 2009 at 11:53
On that sunny day in May, when the European Commission fined Intel $1.54 billion for attempting to unfairly squeeze AMD out of the processor market, it seems likely a number of thrilling new swearwords were invented in Intel’s gleaming Californian offices.
$1.54 billion is, to paraphrase Douglas Adams, a vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big fine, even for a company with the impressive means of Intel. And yet for all the seething injustice the chip giant felt, the one thing that wouldn’t have been seen was panic.
Intel knows full well that even if this humongous fine is allowed to stand, it isn’t going to make a blind bit of difference to a market that it has sewn up tighter than a pair of badly made mittens.
History is littered with penalties and harsh words handed down to transgressing tech companies by bolshy regulators, but very rarely do they threaten the status quo.
Take Microsoft, for example. The software giant has been on the end of so many antitrust investigations they’re thinking of calling in Miss Marple to tackle the next one, and yet it retains a stranglehold on the OS market that even Darth Vader would blanch at.Microsoft has been on the end of so many antitrust investigations they’re thinking of calling in Miss Marple to tackle the next one
The simple fact is that Intel’s $1.54 billion fine won’t reverse AMD’s $330 million loss in the third quarter of 2009. It isn’t going to triple the company’s R&D budget, and it certainly isn’t going to interrupt the tick-tock design and production strategy powering Intel’s Napoleonic conquest of the processor market.
Innovation and investment, not regulation, are the weapons required to knock this king from the throne, and AMD is far too busy clawing its way back into profitability to stage a coup.
But while AMD is scrambling and Intel is arguing, a significant new threat has slipped out of the shadows and, remarkably, it’s British.
Recently, Cambridge-based ARM announced it was ready to take on Intel’s Atom netbook hegemony with its Cortex A9 processor – which will reportedly offer five times the number-crunching fury of the Atom at a comparable power draw.
But while all this bombast certainly spices up a PowerPoint presentation, the most enticing feature of the A9 is that ARM will be offering it without any of the Atom’s rigid restrictions.
As it stands, anybody who wants to build a machine around the Atom is required to have a screen no bigger than 10.2in (although it’s negotiable with individual manufacturers), a hard drive no larger than 160GB, no more than 2GB of RAM and integrated graphics that can’t handle anything beyond DirectX 9. Why? Because Intel doesn’t want cheap netbook processors eroding its more lucrative laptop business.
From around the web
Great article
ARM has been doing really well the last few years especially with the take up of smartphones, satnavs etc.
The only worry is if Intel will start to look at them as a serious competitor and decide to either crush them engage in a hostile takeover.
By JStairmand on 11 Dec 2009 ![]()
Punny Processor
No one said it yet !! oh all right i'll get in first.Perhaps Intel thinks they are ARMless.:-) Sorry about that,could'nt resist it.
By Jaberwocky on 11 Dec 2009 ![]()
Living the dreamer's life
"The simple fact is that Intel’s $1.54 billion fine won’t reverse AMD’s $330 million loss in the third quarter of 2009."
Yes, the EU fine won't do that for AMD. But clearly the $1.25 billion that Intel paid to AMD to settle their anti-trust suit, almost exactly one month ago today, on Nov 12th, will do what you say. This article date says Dec 11th, how can you not have heard about this settlement?
Anyways, ARM being Intel's real competition is a joke. They're not even competing for the same markets. Just a few years ago, Intel was actually an ARM licensee, when it used to make the Xscale processors. Intel blew it out of that market, never to return.
By bbbl67 on 12 Dec 2009 ![]()
Good luck to ARM - I hope they will bring out this Atom killer chip and give intel the kick they deserve for their disgusting underhand dealings towards their rivals.
Don't get me wrong - I think intel chips are excellent - I just don't like the way in which they sell their technology.
By nicomo on 13 Dec 2009 ![]()
Great, so Were is the £50 ARM Cortex A9 dual motherboard To Buy Today
Great, Now show ME a firm or other Outlet that actually Makes and SELLS a £50 ARM Cortex A9 dual motherboard,say just under the size of the generic DVD case then we can talk....
and thats Including the matching £25 case and upto 80watt 12v DC £10 power supply...
to re State:
Great, so Were is the £50 ARM Cortex A9 dual motherboard To Buy Today, ready for Christmas 2009
By storm311 on 13 Dec 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
