Google to put limits on free news
By Barry Collins
Posted on 2 Dec 2009 at 08:21
Newspaper publishers will be allowed to set a limit on the number of free articles people can read via Google News, under new proposals announced by the search engine.
In a clear bid to ease the antagonism between the search giant and newspaper publishers such as Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, Google's First Click Free scheme will allow publishers to demand registration or payment after the viewer has read five articles on their sites.
publishers can limit users to no more than five pages per day without registering or subscribing
"First Click Free is a great way for publishers to promote their content and for users to check out a news source before deciding whether to pay," Josh Cohen, Google's senior business product manager writes on the Google News blog. "Previously, each click from a user would be treated as free. Now, we've updated the program so that publishers can limit users to no more than five pages per day without registering or subscribing."
Google says this will prevent publishers from having to resort to measures such as "cloaking", where they show Google the full content of the page, but withhold access to the full article once the reader's clicked through, in a bid to encourage users to pay.
Yet, whether publishers will be prepared to let readers have access to as many as five articles per day without payment or registration is highly questionable. Visitors from news aggregrators such as Google News are notoriously fickle, usually only staying on a site long enough to read the article they came in for. The vast majority of Google News readers are therefore unlikely to ever encounter the pay wall.
Free samples
Perhaps wary of this, Google is making another concession to publishers. "We will crawl, index and treat as 'free' any preview pages - generally the headline and first few paragraphs of a story - that they [publishers] make available to us," Cohen adds.
"We will then label such stories as 'subscription' in Google News. The ranking of these articles will be subject to the same criteria as all sites in Google, whether paid or free. Paid content may not do as well as free options, but that is not a decision we make based on whether or not it's free. It's simply based on the popularity of the content with users and other sites that link to it."
And in a thinly-veiled warning to Rupert Murdoch, who has threatened to withdraw all his newspaper sites from Google, Cohen says that hiding content isn't the answer. "Whether you're offering your content for free or selling it, it's crucial that people find it," he concludes. "Google can help with that."
The report arrives with reports suggesting Microsoft's deal with News Corp to delist sites from Google has been overblown.
From around the web
Rip off!
A news website should have no problems covering the cost of it's running through online advertising. Saying that, I read my news exclusively online and wouldn't mind paying the cost of the printed paper per day for doing so. People who want to read a couple of stories shouldn't be charged though.
By ralphuk100 on 2 Dec 2009 ![]()
Am I missing something?
Google News only shows the headline and 2-3 lines from the story. After that you have to click through to the site, which can therefore choose to show you the page or require you to login (and hence maybe charge you). What exactly is Google doing other than sending traffic to their websites that would not otherwise reach them?! Crazy, Google should have to do NOTHING. There are some noisy and rich newspaper proprietors who just don't understand the web.
By halsteadk on 2 Dec 2009 ![]()
Who wants to read a complete newspaper on a computer screen! certainly not me. The occasional headlime is all I ever bother with, then it's back to reading my copy of the Telegraph in the comfort of my armchair.
By mikeos4 on 3 Dec 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
