Wikipedia denies editor exodus
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 1 Dec 2009 at 08:39
Wikipedia has refuted suggestions that volunteer contributors are abandoning the site in droves.
A report by Dr Felipe Ortega of the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid revealed that Wikipedia lost 49,000 of its contributors in the first three months of 2009. The figure was ten times higher than during the same period in 2008.
However, the group responsible for maintaining Wikipedia has hit back at the figures, claiming they're inaccurate.
"It’s important to note that Dr Ortega’s study of editing patterns defines as an editor anyone who has made a single edit, however experimental," responds Erik Moeller, deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation, on his blog.
By our narrower definition, just under a million people can be counted as editors across all languages
"This results in a total count of three million editors across all languages. In our own analytics, we choose to define editors as people who have made at least five edits.
"By our narrower definition, just under a million people can be counted as editors across all languages combined. Both numbers include both active and inactive editors."
According to Moeller, the number of people contributing to Wikipedia peaked in 2007, dipped during 2008 and has since stabilised. "Every month, some people stop writing, and every month, they are replaced by new people," Moeller noted.
He also took umbrage with the study's definition of a lapsed editor. "It's impossible to make a determination that a person has left and will never edit again, there are methodological challenges with determining the long term trend of joining and leaving."
So he's just changed the definition of an editor?
That's a horrible, weasely way to win an argument.
He's done nothing about the fact that 10x more people were recorded not coming back than the year before. It's a pretty good piece of information - why isn't he dealing with it?
By steviesteveo on 1 Dec 2009
- Adobe Dreamweaver CC review: first look
- Huawei Ascend P6 review: first look
- Adobe Illustrator CC review: first look
- Let MPs tell us what they really want ISPs to block
- Adobe Photoshop CC review: first look
- WWDC 2013 and iOS 7 launch: live blog
- Sony VAIO Pro review: first look
- Want child porn blocked? Meet the IWF
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Facebook "click on the photo" scams: how they work
- Three alternatives to Word's spelling and grammar checker
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Microsoft Office and the death of upgrades
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts