New-look Google gets the blues
By Barry Collins
Posted on 27 Nov 2009 at 12:20
Google is experimenting with a bold new design on its search homepage.
Significant changes to the Google homepage are rarer than hen's teeth, but the new look is about as radical as they come.
The Spartan design remains, but the subtle grey buttons beneath the search bar have been replaced with garish blue alternatives, presumably to draw greater attention to the "I'm Feeling Lucky" option.
The blue look is retained on the search results page, which now sports a new sidebar, allowing you to search different parts of the Google empire, including Images, News and Video.
There's also options to break down search results by time, restricting results to those published in the past hour, day etc.
The sidebar features themselves aren't new - but they've been previously concealed under the Show Options button that appears discretely above the top search result.
Gizmodo has published instructions on how to access the new design. Note that this only works on Google.com, not Google.co.uk.
From around the web
Can't get it working.
Does it matter that I'm always auto redirected to google.co.uk whenever I try to access google.com?
By a_byrne22 on 27 Nov 2009 ![]()
Last paragraph
"Note that this only works on Google.com, not Google.co.uk."
Yes, it matters
By greemble on 27 Nov 2009 ![]()
Radical???!!
Changing colours.
Options that have been at the top for years(?), now at the side aswell.
Not very inspiring stuff.
What proportion go to the home page these days anyway, when browsers have a search box built-in (usually/defaulted onto Google)?
By davidsoap on 28 Nov 2009 ![]()
I'd much prefer Google to focus on adding all the clever little bits that are hardly noticeable but are immediately indispensable (like being able to drag a route around the map, the recently added filters on search results, etc) than on having a flashy design that slows it down.
@davidsoap - I'm sure a lot of people use the search box to initially access a search engine, but many will surely then go on to modify the search and would do that on the search engine site itself?
By halsteadk on 28 Nov 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement





