OFT: Google isn't harming consumers
Posted on 25 Nov 2009 at 07:39
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) says it has no plans to challenge Google's dominance of the search market because it isn't harming consumers.
Google accounts for almost 90% of the search traffic in the UK, according to the latest figures from monitoring firm Hitwise. However, the chief executive of the OFT says there's no evidence that its monopoly-sized share of the market is doing any damage to consumers.
"Where a company has achieved that position by superior innovation, foresight and better targeting of customers, we're very wary of intervening," John Fingleton told a select committee of MPs, according to a report in The Guardian.
While lots of people have talked to us about harm to competitors, nobody has articulated to us harm to customers
"Thus far, while lots of people have talked to us about harm to competitors, nobody has articulated to us harm to customers or related companies in this market."
"We see a lot of customers benefit from what's happening in this marketplace from very high innovation – it's good for the British economy. We don't want to send a negative signal about that."
The declaration comes as Google faces increased scrutiny over its stranglehold on the search market. Newspaper groups, led by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, are threatening to boycott the search engine, after accusing Google of "stealing their content". Earlier this week it was suggested that the Microsoft-owned Bing would even consider paying publishers to delist from Google.
Google is also facing regulator scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic concerning its plans to digitise millions of books. Google has been forced to redraft its plans to fend off antitrust and copyright concerns.
Author: Barry Collins
Apple
And what about Appl's dominance in the MP3 player market?
And the fact they don't use stanard USB power and computer connectivity cables borders the ridiculous!
By a_byrne22 on 25 Nov 2009 
"harm to competitors, nobody has articulated to us harm to customers or related companies in this market."
Odd, isn't more competition supposed to be better for the customer? If so, less competition should be harming them. And what do they mean by 'related companies'?
Other than that, even if they decided Google was harmful, what are they going to do? Force Google to allow other search engines into people's browsers?
By greemble on 25 Nov 2009 
OFT completely toothless
The OFT likes to roar like a lion. It is disingenuous of them to infer that Google goes about its business by the good grace of the OFT. It is just a happy coincidence that Google IS the 'good guy' in this 'investigation'.
Just look at the ruling on the banks today by the supreme court. That represents the power real power of the OFT.
By Alperian on 25 Nov 2009 
Bull!
.
By zeevro on 25 Nov 2009 
advertisement
- 10 ways to boost traffic to a WordPress blog
- Reaction to the Apple iPad: ten days later
- How to switch off Virgin Media's mobile broadband image compression
- Infotec/Ricoh: here not to help
- TomTom 940T vs iPhone TomTom: a real road test
- Nvidia Fermi update: they have names!
- Twitter oven lets you have your cake and tweet it
- Where online businesses go terribly wrong
- Google Nexus One: first look review
- Dreading the move to ADSL
- The hidden treasures of Sysinternals
- Microsoft must stop silently installing browser plugins
- Crack the Microsoft Server 2008 Core with CoreConfig
- Forget Windows: SMBs should try Snow Leopard Server
- Poking into Facebook security
- Has Microsoft shot itself in the foot with Security Essentials?
- Smashing the BlackBerry myths
- Has Microsoft solved our stylesheet woes with Super Preview?
- Automated printing of SQL Server Reports
- Setting up iSCSI on a desktop PC
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


