MPs urge McKinnon extradition rethink
Posted on 13 Nov 2009 at 09:05
The Home Affairs Select Committee has urged the UK Government to halt the extradition of Gary McKinnon.
McKinnon is facing extradition to the US on 97 counts of hacking NASA and military networks. However, his legal team have argued that his Asperger's syndrome would make him a "suicide risk" should the extradition go ahead.
It appears the Home Affairs Select Committee agrees.
"Because of Mr McKinnon's precarious state of mental health, the Committee is of the view that he should not be extradited to the USA and that you should exercise your discretion in this case," Keith Vaz, chairman of the committee, wrote to the Home Secretary Alan Johnson.
McKinnon - the story so far
Follow Gary McKinnon's story from the beginning in our featureJohnson has informed the committee that he's examining medical reports on McKinnon's condition to determine if extraditing the hacker would constitute a breach of his human rights.
If it does, the extradition can be blocked, however, the Home Secretary has previously argued that beyond this his hands are tied by the controversial Extradition Act 2003 between the US and UK.
The treaty allows US authorities to demand a Briton's extradition without having to provide evidence. It also came under the Committee's scrutiny and was blasted for its "serious lack of equality", with Vaz recommending that the Home Secretary conduct a ""comprehensive review".
The Home Office swiftly rejected the call. "As the home secretary told the Home Affairs Select Committee, the evidence that must be provided for a US extradition request to proceed in the UK is in practice the same as for a UK request to proceed in the US.
The suggestion that the operation of the Extradition Act needs to be reviewed comprehensively is unnecessary. Unless the evidence shows that extradition would breach the European Convention on Human Rights it would be unlawful to refuse extradition," it stated.
Author: Stuart Turton
Muppets
"The treaty allows US authorities to demand a Briton's extradition without having to provide evidence."
What muppet signed up to that!
By Grunthos on 13 Nov 2009 
Muppets
All of them.
By tully on 13 Nov 2009 
Up until...
..."Keith Vaz".
This, I'm guessing, would be the Keith Vaz who campaigned against Bully then? A game he had never played, seen played or even asked for experiences of those who had played it.
This man makes as much sense as a papier mache barbecue at the best of times, so not really swayed onto the side of McKinnon any more by his attachment to this case.
By bioreit on 13 Nov 2009 
"the evidence that must be provided...is in practice the same"
So, maybe Keith's committee saying the treaty has a "serious lack of equality" used the same method to decide against a computer game?
By greemble on 13 Nov 2009 
advertisement
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


