MPs urge McKinnon extradition rethink
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 13 Nov 2009 at 09:05
The Home Affairs Select Committee has urged the UK Government to halt the extradition of Gary McKinnon.
McKinnon is facing extradition to the US on 97 counts of hacking NASA and military networks. However, his legal team have argued that his Asperger's syndrome would make him a "suicide risk" should the extradition go ahead.
It appears the Home Affairs Select Committee agrees.
"Because of Mr McKinnon's precarious state of mental health, the Committee is of the view that he should not be extradited to the USA and that you should exercise your discretion in this case," Keith Vaz, chairman of the committee, wrote to the Home Secretary Alan Johnson.
McKinnon - the story so far
Follow Gary McKinnon's story from the beginning in our featureJohnson has informed the committee that he's examining medical reports on McKinnon's condition to determine if extraditing the hacker would constitute a breach of his human rights.
If it does, the extradition can be blocked, however, the Home Secretary has previously argued that beyond this his hands are tied by the controversial Extradition Act 2003 between the US and UK.
The treaty allows US authorities to demand a Briton's extradition without having to provide evidence. It also came under the Committee's scrutiny and was blasted for its "serious lack of equality", with Vaz recommending that the Home Secretary conduct a ""comprehensive review".
The Home Office swiftly rejected the call. "As the home secretary told the Home Affairs Select Committee, the evidence that must be provided for a US extradition request to proceed in the UK is in practice the same as for a UK request to proceed in the US.
The suggestion that the operation of the Extradition Act needs to be reviewed comprehensively is unnecessary. Unless the evidence shows that extradition would breach the European Convention on Human Rights it would be unlawful to refuse extradition," it stated.
From around the web
Muppets
"The treaty allows US authorities to demand a Briton's extradition without having to provide evidence."
What muppet signed up to that!
By Grunthos on 13 Nov 2009 ![]()
Muppets
All of them.
By tully on 13 Nov 2009 ![]()
Up until...
..."Keith Vaz".
This, I'm guessing, would be the Keith Vaz who campaigned against Bully then? A game he had never played, seen played or even asked for experiences of those who had played it.
This man makes as much sense as a papier mache barbecue at the best of times, so not really swayed onto the side of McKinnon any more by his attachment to this case.
By bioreit on 13 Nov 2009 ![]()
"the evidence that must be provided...is in practice the same"
So, maybe Keith's committee saying the treaty has a "serious lack of equality" used the same method to decide against a computer game?
By greemble on 13 Nov 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement
