Spotify stems interest in illegal downloads
By Barry Collins
Posted on 6 Nov 2009 at 09:43
Almost two thirds of people who admit to illegal downloading claim Spotify has led them to cut their use of illegitimate services or stop using them altogether.
The research of more than 2,300 British adults, commissioned by Moneysupermarket.com, will raise hopes that providing attractive alternatives to illegal downloads will prove more effective in curbing piracy than draconian clampdowns.
The survey found that one in eight Brits admit to downloading copyrighted music illegally. However, 62% of those illegal downloaders said Spotify's unlimited streaming service had encouraged them to reduce the amount they download illegally or to stop using such services completely.
The news comes just a week after the Government confirmed controversial plans to start disconnecting illegal file-sharers from 2011.
Spotify has emerged from nowhere to become a household name in the space of a year. The service had to revert to an invite-only system earlier this year, after the release of the Spotify iPhone and Android apps placed huge demand on the company's servers.
Spotify is part-owned by the music labels, but it still awaits to be seen whether its blend of paid-for subscription services and advertising-supported free streaming is a sustainable business model.
The music industry isn't the only one benefiting from Spotify's popularity. Moneysupermarket.com claims that interest in streaming and video services has led to an increase in the number of people looking for unlimited broadband accounts.
From around the web
an increase in the number of people looking for unlimited broadband
.
...you can see the problem right there!
By phantombudgie on 6 Nov 2009 ![]()
"but it still awaits to be seen whether its blend of paid-for subscription services and advertising-supported free streaming is a sustainable business model"
Well the subscrption service was a dead duck from the outset. Hopefully Spotify will survive though.
By Lacrobat on 6 Nov 2009 ![]()
To go back back?
"revert back" - Sorry? What?
One of my pet hates...
By greemble on 6 Nov 2009 ![]()
Back to the future
You're absolutely right, Greemble, a schoolboy error.
Now corrected.
Barry Collins
Online Editor
By Barry_Collins on 6 Nov 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement
