Apple boosts iMac screen size to 27in
By Barry Collins
Posted on 20 Oct 2009 at 17:22
Apple has bumped up the screen size of the iMac to 27in as part of a refresh of its Mac line-up.
The new 27in iMac boasts a LED-backlit display with a 16:9 aspect ratio and resolution of 2,560 x 1,440. It's an increase of 3in on the previous flagship iMac, which was restricted to a 1,920 x 1,200 resolution.
The internals have also been given a performance boost, with the entry-level 27in iMac containing a 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 4GB of RAM. A more powerful model includes a Core i5 quad-core processor running at 2.66GHz and 4GB of RAM. The 27in models will start from $1,700 (£1,038) - UK pricing has yet to be confirmed.
The company has also released two new 21.5in models, which start from $1,200 (£733).
All of the iMacs will ship with Apple's new "Magic Mouse", which uses the same multitouch technology as the iPhone. The entire upper surface of the mouse is described as "a seamless multitouch surface" that allows users to swipe through photo collections or web pages, for example. The mouse can be configured as either a single or dual-button mouse.
New-look MacBook
Apple's laptops haven't been neglected in the refresh. The new entry-level MacBook is both slimmer and lighter than its predecessor, thanks to a new unibody design - which is fast becoming standard on Mac laptops. That of course means it borrows the non-removable battery from its MacBook Pro brethen, which Apple claims offers seven hours battery life and up to 1,000 recharges.
The 13.3in MacBook has a 1,280 x 800 glossy display and sports a 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor. There's only 2GB of RAM supplied as standard, although that can be boosted to 4GB. It will start at $999.
Mac mini refresh
The Mac mini has also been given a spruce up. The most interesting newcomer is the $999 model, which ships with Snow Leopard Server and somehow squeezes two 500GB hard disks into the device's tiny frame.
The entry-level $599 mini has been upgraded to a 2.26GHz Core 2 Duo processor, although the 2GB of RAM and 160GB hard disk is still a little sparse.
From around the web
Are you talking about a separate pad or is it a touch screen?
By aron311 on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
Are you talking about a separate pad or is it a touch screen?
By aron311 on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
Oh ok article updated :)
By aron311 on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
UK pricing yet to be confirmed?!?
Er, what about the prices given here (for at least the last 2 hours if not longer) then: http://www.apple.com/uk/imac/
21.5" starting at £949.
27" starting at £1349.
By halsteadk on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
Sweet update. Want 27!!! If only the matte display was an option.
By Gz_nigelcarter1a on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
so the difference between the Macbook and the cheap MacBook pro seems to be the case. They are identical laptops aren't they but the pro is £100 dearer because it has an aluminium case instead of a polycarbonate?
By TimoGunt on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
no they're not identical. The Pro model has a smaller hard drive!! That has totally taken away the whole point of the pro name. The standard Macbook is a better laptop and cheaper
By TimoGunt on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
The 27 inch iMac is almost good value. The massive 2560 x 1440 screen is nice but it still could do with a blu ray drive
By TimoGunt on 20 Oct 2009 ![]()
Which macbook to choose? For £100 extra on the Pro, you get an SD card slot, Firewire port, backlit keyboard but less storage space. Not so much of a pro now but more of an amateur.
By sekrapa on 21 Oct 2009 ![]()
don't forget the other key difference between the macbook and the macbook pro... the pro can hold up to 8GB of RAM where the Macbook can only hold up to 4GB.
Agreed that Apple dropped the ball by giving the white macbook more hard drive as standard than the MBP. The Macbook is now very appealing, esp with the updated display, but the loss of firewire and no SD slot might be the clincher for some people. the MBP also needs a processor speed bump, then the £100 extra would be a bargain
By hjlupton on 21 Oct 2009 ![]()
The new iMac is a lovely machine, especially in 27" but the continued ommission of a Blu-ray drive is a major flaw.
Why have a more than full HD screen with no HD drive?
Madness.
By aidansomerville on 22 Oct 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement



