Spotify: we will not become "a digital music graveyard"
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 9 Oct 2009 at 08:51
Spotify chief executive Daniel Ek has defended the viability of the streaming-music service's business model, claiming his principal concern is to avoid the business becoming "a digital music graveyard".
The service, now a year old, offers users the ability to stream music for free from all the major record labels, at the cost of being interrupted by adverts in between tracks.
Alternatively, you can upgrade to the premium version of the service for £10 per month, which strips out the ads, as well as offline playback and the ability to use the Spotify iPhone and Android app.
However, despite attracting five million users, questions have been raised over how Spotify can make money, with so many people seemingly content to stick with the free version.
iTunes missed its revenue targets in its first year by 30%, and label executives were far from convinced that this was the future
Ek drew comparisons with iTunes, though he admitted the company "has a long way to go."
"The notion of overnight success is very misleading and actually rather harmful to any hope for long term and sustainable growth in this industry. Yet this is unfortunately something the music industry as a whole is particularly good at, expecting business models to be proven within months of inception," Ek notes on the Spotify blog.
"The truth is that even the most successful digital business to date, iTunes, missed its revenue targets in its first year by 30%, and label executives were far from convinced that this was the future.
"It would obviously be wrong for me to compare Apple's success with iTunes to Spotify... yet whatever the business, big success takes years to build and there are very few counter examples. We are in this for the long haul. We aren't interested in just trying to hype the company and then 'flipping it'."
From around the web
How CAN they go out of business?
They're pimping music! It's the oldest profession...
By cheysuli on 9 Oct 2009 ![]()
Easily
Unless they're getting the music for free, and the hosting for free, and their staff work for free, they have costs, just like any other business.
By Lacrobat on 9 Oct 2009 ![]()
Summary of costs
The Guardian have done a nice summary of all Spotify's operating costs and incomes. Makes for an interesting read, if all based on (accurate) conjecture:
http://snipurl.com/guarspotblog [www_guardian_co_uk]
By pbryanw on 9 Oct 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
