1984 blunder costs Amazon $150,000
By Reuters and Barry Collins
Posted on 5 Oct 2009 at 06:30
Amazon has paid $150,000 to settle a lawsuit that claimed the online retailer illegally deleted copies of George Orwell's 1984 from its Kindle eBook readers.
The lawsuit was initially filed by a student and a fellow Kindle buyer back in July, in the US District Court in Seattle. It claimed Amazon didn't have the right to delete digital content that had been purchased by consumers for use on their Kindles.
This summer, Amazon acknowledged it deleted certain purchased eBooks from the Kindles after learning that a third party who had posted the books didn't have the legal rights to do so. Amazon boss Jeff Bezos later apologised for the deletions, describing the matter as "stupid, thoughtless, and painfully out of line with our principles."
The settlement reveals that Amazon offered consumers whose books had been deleted a new free digital copy as well as $30. The reimbursement made it unlikely for a judge to certify a class-action, the plaintiffs claim in the settlement.
Under the terms of the settlement, Amazon will not delete such works in the future unless the consumer agrees, or unless a refund is requested or the work contains harmful embedded code that would hurt operation of the Kindle.
Amazon will pay the plaintiffs' lawyers a fee of $150,000 to be donated to "a charitable organisation that promotes literacy, children's issues, secondary or post- secondary education, health or job placement," according to the settlement.
From around the web
pcpro 5.10.09 reporting Amazon fine doubleplusungood rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling
I think you'll find the fine was only $75,000. Or perhaps only $50,000. Or maybe there never was a fine.
All over the Amazon HQ, people spontaneously left their desks to march in the streets, praising the Kindle for "their new, happy life".
By Lacrobat on 5 Oct 2009 ![]()
How can it be illegal to delete something that is illegal?
I might use this as a defense if I hear from the BPI.
By peterm2k on 5 Oct 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
