Internet Explorer suffers sharp drop in September
By Barry Collins
Posted on 2 Oct 2009 at 11:24
Internet Explorer's worldwide market share dropped by more than 1.2% in September, its sharpest fall in almost a year.
The Microsoft browser now has 65.8% of the browser market, according to the latest stats from Net Applications, down from 74.2% of the market in September last year.
The figures suggest that this summer's release of Internet Explorer 8 has done nothing to stem the browser's seeping market share, which once boasted more than 90% of the market.
By contrast, all four of Microsoft's next closest rivals recorded modest gains. Firefox increased its market share by 0.8% to reach 23.8%, although it's still recovering from a summer slump of its own.
Safari and Google's Chrome both continue to climb impressively, too. Third-place Safari now stands on 4.2% of the market (up from 2.8% only a year ago), while Chrome has gone from zero to 3.2% of the market over the course of the past year.
The blood-letting will be particularly worrying for Microsoft, given that it has come under renewed attack from its rivals recently. Google is attempting to replace IE's rendering engine with its new Chrome Frame plug-in, while Opera and Mozilla are urging the EU to take an even tougher stance against Microsoft's proposals for dealing with browser antitrust issues. Microsoft is proposing to allow users to choose a rival browser at the point of installation.
From around the web
That's ironic, since I have using Firefox for several years now but have just gone back to IE (8) since the latest upgrade to FF runs like a dog on my windows XP installation.
I also dabble a bit with Chrome, but I encounter quite a few sites that don't render correctly.
So after years of encouraging diversity and freedom of choice I find myself drawn back to the darkside
By pauld1024 on 2 Oct 2009 ![]()
I used Firefox for years on both PC and Mac but gave up after it's memory hogging habits caused my machine to crash repeatedly. Now I use Safari which is actually quicker.
By SwissMac on 3 Oct 2009 ![]()
Isn't it about time PC Pro do a head-to-head review on these top 5 browsers? (Something Microsoft will pay to avoid).
By zeevro on 3 Oct 2009 ![]()
Quite a few people have commented to me that they didn't like losing the menus in IE; and they'd moved on because of that. Personally, I fine Firefox works fine on both my XP and Vista machines; and won't be changing any time soon.
By pike_by_nature on 3 Oct 2009 ![]()
As with a couple of the commenters above, I've used Firefox for years but have been slowly switching back to IE since the release of v8. I still use FF for some sites but I do find IE8 renders some sites better and quicker than FF.
By Bassey1976 on 5 Oct 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement



