EC exposes Dell's Intel fears
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 21 Sep 2009 at 11:44
The European Commission has hit back in its antitrust battle with Intel, releasing excerpts from the testimony of PC makers.
The EC imposed a record $1.45 billion fine on Intel for paying computer makers to postpone or cancel plans to launch products that used AMD chips - a practice which it claimed "harmed millions of European consumers".
However, in its appeal Intel called the fine "manifestly disproportionate", and accused the European Commission of ignoring crucial evidence from manufacturers such as Dell.
We have slower, hotter products that cost more across the board in the enterprise with no hope of closing the performance gap for 1-2 years (Dell statement)
The accusation has clearly upset the EC, which has published excerpts from the testimony of the PC makers it interviewed during its investigation in order to back up its verdict.
Among the most damning is a quote from an internal Dell presentation held in 2003, in which the company claimed Intel's retaliation "could be severe and prolonged with impact to all lines of business" should the company switch to AMD.
The excerpt also reveals that Dell complained to Intel that their agreement was making the PC manufacturer uncompetitive.
"AMD is a great threat to our business. Intel is increasingly uncompetitive to AMD which results in Dell being uncompetitive. We have slower, hotter products that cost more across the board in the enterprise with no hope of closing the performance gap for 1-2 years," Dell's testimony reads.
HP told the Commission that Intel's massive rebates were offered on an unwritten requirement "that HP should purchase at least 95% of its business desktop system from Intel".
A December 2006 email from a Lenovo executive admitted the PC maker had cut a "lucrative deal" under which "Intel will not allow us to launch AMD".
Intel says it is reviewing the documents.
From around the web
Good I'm glad the EU are fighting back. I'd started to think it was an ambush, but these allegations really are something the EU should be concerned about.
By c6ten on 21 Sep 2009 ![]()
There was a time when the US led the way on controlling anti-competitive behaviour, but they seem to have dropped the ball during the Bush years and let a lot of big firms off the hook. Thank goodness for the EU!
By SwissMac on 21 Sep 2009 ![]()
@SwissMac
I'm not sure that's true. The US would have been very hot if American interests were being damaged, but all of the companies here are American. However, I totally agree with 'Thank goodness for the EU.'
By jgwilliams on 21 Sep 2009 ![]()
Time to Pay?
I hope Intel accepts this and pays up. AMD has been on the 'A list' at PC pro for ever (just about anyway). A fair market should see them doing better. Will AMD go after Intel for lose of earning?
It is going to be a rough ride for Intel, Arms moving up, the EU clamping down and AMD in the middle to pick up the pieces.
By M_Hamer on 21 Sep 2009 ![]()
Unfair charges.
Dell, Hp and Lenovo are big enough companies to not accept the offers and bought any chipset they wanted. It is their greed that resulted in them taking the offer. So stop crying you manufacturers.
By curiousclive on 22 Sep 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
