US re-opens mobile phone cancer debate
By Reuters
Posted on 15 Sep 2009 at 08:11
US senator Tom Harkin - newly empowered to investigate health matters as chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labour and Pensions Committee - has promised to probe deeply into any potential links between mobile phone use and cancer.
Harkin, who took over the committee earlier this month after the death of Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy, says he is concerned no one has been able to prove mobile phones do not cause cancer.
"I'm reminded of this nation's experience with cigarettes," Harkin says. "Decades passed between the first warnings about smoking tobacco and the final definitive conclusion that cigarettes cause lung cancer."
Decades passed between the first warnings about smoking tobacco and the final definitive conclusion that cigarettes cause lung cancer
Mobile phones, used by four billion people worldwide, use radio waves. Years of research has failed to establish any clear link between their use and several kinds of cancer, including brain tumours.
Recent worries have been raised by the Environmental Working Group, an activist group, and epidemiologist Devra Lee Davis of the University of Pittsburgh, who has written a book alleging the US Government has overlooked many potential sources of cancer.
Harkin called a hearing of the Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Labour, Health and Human Services, and Education to look into the questions. "I will pursue this beyond this panel, with NIH [the National Institutes of Health]," Harkin said after the hearing.
A staffer claims the senator became concerned by a report from the Environmental Working Group showing that radio wave emissions vary from one mobile phone brand and model to another; as well as reports suggesting there might be a link.
No evidence
Linda Erdreich of science and engineering firm Exponent in New York claims 50 years' worth of evidence had failed to show that mobile phones can cause cancer.
"This part of the spectrum is known as non-ionising radiation," she told the hearing, explaining that this means radio waves cannot damage the DNA in cells.
But Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter pressed her on this, asking her repeatedly whether science had conclusively proved there was no connection. "Your statement that it is hard to prove a negative is right on," Erdreich replied.
"What comes through to me is that we just don't know what the answer is," said Specter, a cancer survivor who said he avoids white flour and sugar in case it might feed tumours.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
