Google Chrome embraces extensions
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 10 Sep 2009 at 10:20
Chrome has taken a step closer to adopting extensions, after they were turned on by default in the developer build.
Extensions allow users to customise their browser with add-ons, and are a large part of Firefox's success. Previously, extensions only worked in Chrome for those who enabled them through the command line, but in switching them on by default Google is hoping to build momentum around the feature.
"This is the first step in our launch process, and it means we're ready for a few more people to start using extensions - the kind of adventurous people who populate the dev channel," says Aaron Boodman, the Google engineer behind the extensions project.
We focused on getting most of the basic infrastructure and security pieces in place, in particular our new permission system
"For this release, we focused on getting most of the basic infrastructure and security pieces in place, in particular our new permission system. Going forward, we are working hard towards a release on the Beta Channel. The UI is likely to change as we bring it up to Google Chrome's high standard, and we're still finishing up a few APIs," he says.
Early sample extensions include a Gmail inbox checker and bookmark syncing tool. Unlike Firefox extensions, those used in Chrome are written using web technologies including HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Mozilla is working on a similar extension framework, dubbed Jetpack.
The developer builds are released nightly, often with untried new features or bug fixes that Google doesn't believe are ready to be inflicted on those using the stable release.
Initially, this was a steady trickle of features but has more recently become a flood, with an extension framework, theme support, Windows 7 jumplists and now bookmark syncing all taking their place in the browser.
From around the web
When...
...it gets a NoScript and FlashBlock equivalents, I'll give it another try.
By big_D on 10 Sep 2009 ![]()
And a way to block the google recommended clutter on the right of the screen.
Going back to a machine that didn't use my home ad filter was truly horrid. Flashing banners, buzzing pop-ups, javascript slowing sites down, content mangled by block adverts ... and that's just the pcpro site and trustedreviews.
Really, ads just annoy most, but for some people they can cause real problems. Usually they just drive readers away (because they can't read the page).
By bubbles16 on 10 Sep 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
