Microsoft bemoans Google book deal
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 9 Sep 2009 at 15:52
Microsoft has blasted Google's book digitisation deal with US publishers as "an unprecedented misuse of the judicial system".
The deal will see Google pay $125 million to the Authors Guild and the Association of American publishers to create a massive repository of digitised books, where authors and publishers can register works and receive a portion of the revenues earned from ads, subscriptions and sales.
In its filing to the US District Court of New York, Microsoft claimed the deal would give Google a stranglehold on the nascent digital book market: "The proposed settlement confers on Google a new monopoly by authorising Google (and Google alone) to engage in the wholesale commercial exploitation of entire copyrighted books."
These closed-door negotiations excluded millions of copyright owners and the very public that copyright law serves
The software giant went on to bemoan the nature of negotiations, claiming they rode roughshod over the rights of authors: "These closed-door negotiations excluded millions of copyright owners and the very public that copyright law serves.
"Google and the plaintiffs seek to arrogate public policymaking to themselves, bypass Congress and the free market, and force a sweeping 'joint venture' – built on copyrights owned by a largely absent class – via this Court's order," it claims.
The filing follows a similar one by Amazon last week, which described the book deal as "an antitrust nightmare". The retail giant was subsequently blasted by the Author's Guild, which claimed "Amazon's hypocrisy is breathtaking".
Google has shrugged off objections to the deal, claiming "the books settlement is injecting more competition into the digital books space, so it's understandable why our competitors might fight hard to prevent more competition."
From around the web
translation
"The proposed settlement confers on Google a new monopoly by authorising Google (and Google alone) to engage in the wholesale commercial exploitation of entire copyrighted books."
= Wish we'd thought of it.
By jamesyld on 9 Sep 2009 ![]()
Sour grapes
I agree I think that Microsoft wish they were doing it. Though I doubt that it will be a great money spinner for Google.
By Amnesia10 on 9 Sep 2009 ![]()
The only issue I see is if Google and their partners stop another company from doing the same thing.
Oh, and exclusive deals if they're not currently permitted in the physical book market.
By Phoomeister on 10 Sep 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement
