Parents blasted for ignoring online threats to children
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 8 Sep 2009 at 13:23
The head of the body responsible for keeping children safe online has blasted parents for failing to act on the advice given to them.
"It is too easy to say, 'Oh. I don't understand the technology'. How many parents go online to book their holidays or use the internet to compare insurance prices?" Jim Gamble, head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) told the Times Online.
"But when it comes to learning what you should do to protect your child, we're not seeing people accessing that information in the right numbers."
People don't want to face the reality, it's too horrible to contemplate
According to Gamble, a recent CEOP media campaign urging parents to visit a site explaining how to safeguard their children online yielded a paltry 300 hits in the 24 hours after it was aired. He puts it down to parents not wanting to face the "harsh reality".
"Most of us will go through life without having to deal with the horrible situation of having a child groomed online or abducted by someone they meet on the internet. People don't want to face that reality, it's too horrible to contemplate."
"But if you have ever worried about your child, you need to take heed of the advice available," says Gamble.
From around the web
Education not Condemnation
As suggested in the brief; MOST people will NOT ever experience this type of crime.
It is also apparent that some parents teach their children the harsh realities of life and warn them about grooming.
Grooming (probably of a much higher count) also takes place outside of Internet circles when young people get enticed by lots of money for "favours".
Parents tend to trust and believe their children's capacity of intelligence than to get involved on-line.
Let us not forget that many adults also get caught out by on-line crime.
Crimestoppers recently posted an article I found heinous.
In the interest of education.....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8222087.
stm
By lenmontieth on 9 Sep 2009 ![]()
Don't understand...
My girlfriend has 2 daughters, they both had 10 year old hand-me-down computers, she didn't have a computer, doesn't see the point in them and can't use them...
The youngest daughter has received 2 solictor's letters for non-payment of the €250 subscription fees to "free" music sites. Luckily she is to young to be held accountable and a friendly solicitor, who loves taking on these scammers, dealt with it for free.
I'm slowly trying to teach her to use a computer, but she just can't see the point in them...
By big_D on 9 Sep 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
