Skip to navigation
Latest News

Government hits back over file-sharing clampdown

Ethernet cable

By Barry Collins

Posted on 28 Aug 2009 at 08:01

The Government has issued a spiky response to critics of its plans to cut off the broadband connections of persistent illegal file sharers.

In a blog post addressing several of the "accusations" that have been thrown at the Government, the Digital Britain team deny the Government has ignored the advice contained its own Digital Britain report, which stopped short of recommending connections be suspended.

"It would be nice if the policies we set out in the Digital Britain Report were so widely accepted that people considered them immutable, but this certainly isn’t true," the blog post states.

"We were consulting on the package set out in Digital Britain and have added further proposals as the result of further consideration. The core proposals – notification of those who seem to be breaching copyright, with a sanction of technical measures if that is not working, remain in place."

We realise that it is possible for mistakes to occur or for people to have their wireless connection hijacked

The Digital Britain team once again denies that Lord Mandelson's meeting with American film producer David Geffen had any impact on the Government's change of heart, claiming that "it simply became clear to us that we needed to add more ideas to the discussion for people to consider."

The Digital Britain team also says that citizens will be given a right to appeal against the decision to cut off their broadband connection, before the disconnection takes place. "We realise that it is possible for mistakes to occur or for people to have their wireless connection hijacked," the blog states. "We will set up an appeals mechanism so that the consumer has an easy appeals route at each stage."

Nevertheless, the Government remains confident that disconnecting file sharers is lawful, despite the fact that a similar attempt by France to impose a three-strikes-and-you're-out system was blocked by the EU. "We believe what we are doing complies with national and EU law but obviously if the law in Europe changes, then we will need to make sure what we do is compliant," the Digital Britain team claims.

"Amendment 138 has been mentioned a lot, but in fact it has not been adopted (by the EC); although it is set for conciliation in the autumn."

Barry Collins on why you could lose your broadband for doing absolutely nothing wrong

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

I use a file sharing site

It's called "gameupdates.org" and it contains every patch to every PC game out there. So rather than subscribe to FilePlanet or others, I can quickly download the latest patch to any game via BitTorrent.

There are many legal uses for torrrents (this being just one I use) and the whole issue is clouded in FUD put about by the music and film industry.

By cheysuli on 28 Aug 2009

Lawful

Since when was it legal to punish the whole family/household/university/cafe etc. when one single person breaks the law?

By zeevro on 28 Aug 2009

Medieval?

[quote]Since when was it legal to punish the whole family/household/university/cafe etc. when one single person breaks the law?[/quote]

Isn't that the sort of thing that went on in medieval times? Well if you swap downloading for poaching.

By jamesyld on 28 Aug 2009

"Isn't that the sort of thing that went on in medieval times? Well if you swap downloading for poaching."

and you swap Lord for King Mandelson I

By chapelgarth on 28 Aug 2009

"Isn't that the sort of thing that went on in medieval times? Well if you swap downloading for poaching."

and you swap Lord for King Mandelson I

By chapelgarth on 28 Aug 2009

What if the downloader HAS already paid the royalty in some other way?

With the vast majority of films having been broadcast on TV, and many music downloaders having previously bought the same music (particularly vintage stuff) on vinyl or CD, who is to say that such downloading breaches copyright?

No doubt the media barons would, but from an ethical standpoint this seems to be perfectly fair use of a product on which royalty has already been paid.

So, how will it be determined that downloading is of material for which royalty has NOT already been paid? I don't see how it can be.

By Anteaus on 28 Aug 2009

Zionist New World Order conspiracy anyone? First internet, then your RFID bank card (or sub dermal chip) will be disconnected and you'll be ostracised from society.

By dodge1963 on 28 Aug 2009

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.