Skip to navigation
Latest News

Wikipedia limits edits on biographies of living

Wikipedia logo

By Stuart Turton

Posted on 25 Aug 2009 at 10:52

Wikipedia will require edits made about a living person to be signed off by an experienced editor as part of its "flagged revisions" feature.

Flagged revisions mean that changes made in the biographies of living people cannot go live until they've been reviewed by one of Wikipedia's senior editors - an acknowledgement by the site that it needs to become more dependable.

"We are no longer at the point that it is acceptable to throw things at the wall and see what sticks," Michael Snow, chairman of the Wikimedia board tells The New York Times. "There was a time probably when the community was more forgiving of things that were inaccurate or fudged in some fashion — whether simply misunderstood or an author had some axe to grind. There is less tolerance for that sort of problem now."

We are no longer at the point that it is acceptable to throw things at the wall and see what sticks

The system is already in place on the German version of the site, and will be rolled out to the English-language Wikipedia in the next few weeks. It's sure to prove controversial among those who consider Wikipedia's status as "the free encyclopaedia anyone can edit" to be sacred.

The move comes as Wikipedia continues its struggle to balance openness and accuracy. High-profile pages, including those of political leaders, are often protected, or semi-protected meaning edits can only be made by approved contributors.

More controversially, back in June The New York Times revealed it had worked with Wikipedia to suppress articles about the kidnapping of reporter David Rohde in Afghanistan. While the action may have saved his life, it still dismayed those who consider Wikipedia the people's encyclopaedia.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Wikipedia's credibility

hi,
I just stumbled upon quite an old YouTube video portraying - in rather hilarious way - the above mentioned credibility problems:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaADQTeZRCY

By stasi47 on 25 Aug 2009

Anyone can edit

It's all very well having a "free encyclopaedia anyone can edit" or a "people's encyclopaedia" but there's no point to it at all if the information in it is unreliable. Wikipedia has every right to make this change to protect its reputation - it seems acceptable to me that unproven editors should have their contributions checked before they are published as "fact".

By halsteadk on 25 Aug 2009

The trouble with people

People are not accurate and reliable. When everyone can edit something, everyone will. So what you end up with is an interesting mix of bias, selective acknowlegement of facts, discrimination and outright grudges and mud slinging.

This is the reason peer-reviewed journals are used in science.

By phantombudgie on 25 Aug 2009

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented News Stories
More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest ReviewsSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.