Ofcom delays plans for two-hour mobile number transfers
By Barry Collins
Posted on 3 Aug 2009 at 12:22
Ofcom has postponed plans to accelerate the speed at which customers can transfer their mobile phone number from one network to another.
Back in 2007, the telecoms regulator told mobile phone networks that they had until 1 September 2009 to complete the process in two hours.
However, Ofcom's plans were scuppered last year when the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) ruled that the regulator had failed to prove that accelerating the process would cost networks only £5m. Vodafone successfully argued the cost would be closer to £37m.
Today, Ofcom has issued a fresh consultation on the issue, which is less ambitious and puts off the deadline for another two years.
Today's proposal "sets out options for faster porting including completing the process within two hours or within one working day".
Ofcom says it "aims to have any new porting process arrangements in place during 2011", after a lengthy period of consultation with the industry.
A spokesperson for Ofcom defended the delay and watering down of the proposals, claiming that the regulator has to "consider the cost of the proposals for the industry".
"We've gone back and looked at the issue afresh and done some pretty detailed cost calculations," the spokesperson told PC Pro. "These things take a while."
The spokesperson also claimed that the two-hour deadline would put Britain ahead of the rest of Europe, with the EC currently consulting on proposals to bring number porting to within one working day.
Ofcom also wants to simplify the way number transfers are handled. Instead of customers having to ring their existing network and request a Porting Authorisation Code (PAC) that has to be supplied to the new network, Ofcom wants the new network to handle the entire process.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
