Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk
Designers criticise Outlook 2010
Posted on 24 Jun 2009 at 11:56
The Email Standards Project (ESP) has organised a petition against Microsoft's planned use of the Word rendering engine to display HTML email in Outlook.
The group of designers, which advises email client developers, has complained that the move would make designing HTML emails far harder.
"After testing the latest beta of Outlook 2010 and seeing the same poor standards support as 2007, a senior member of the Outlook team confirmed they plan on continuing to use Word to render HTML emails," explains a post on the ESP blog.
"Not only that, but early tests indicate that HTML support in the Word engine has not been improved in any way. Same bugs. Same quirks," it adds.
To demonstrate its objection, the ESP blog post includes a screenshot of an email rendered in both Outlook 2000 and 2010. In the newer version of the software, the email appears without much of the styling present when viewed in Outlook 2000.
Microsoft claims that the use of the Word rendering engine gives Outlook users access to tools such as SmartArt and automatic templates. Outlook product manager, Dev Balasubramanian, explained the design decision to the ESP.
"I am aware of where this decision on our part places Outlook from a standards perspective - at the same time, we ask that you consider the benefits Outlook users get from having Word tools in their email authoring experience," he said.
The ESP suggests that a good compromise would be to update the Word rendering engine to support standard HTML. The petition is designed to encourage Microsoft to adopt this strategy between now and Outlook 2010's release, expected in a year's time.
"Outlook 2010 is still in beta and Microsoft wants your feedback. It's time to rally together and encourage Microsoft to embrace web standards before it's too late," says the petition's website.
At the time of writing, 8,191 people had signed the petition, by tweeting a meesage that includes the URL fixoutlook.org.
Author: Matthew Sparkes
Not in a decillion years
Microsoft is to standards as ETA is to public safety, with about the same apparent level of regard for public opinion. If Lookout 2010 *were* standards-compliant, even to the degree that IE 8 is, well, then, anybody could use any old standards-compliant system to send valid HTML-formatted mail to Lookout usees. And how would Microsoft be able to enforce the walls on their walled 'community' then?
There's absolutely no reason why they couldn't use IE components for rendering rather than Word. You'd still have the security of Baghdad circa 2005, but at least it would LOOK like it was working a whole lot better.
By jdickey1 on 13 Aug 2009 
advertisement
- Need a bit of extra Christmas cash? Grass up your boss, says BSA
- Photoshop Mobile on Android review: first look
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
