Microsoft pledges huge investment in search
By Reuters
Posted on 19 Jun 2009 at 08:19
Microsoft is willing to invest up to 10% of its operating income on search for up to five years, says Steve Ballmer.
The company's new search engine, Bing, has been winning market share from rivals, according to industry data released this week, but still trails market leader Google by a long way.
"Our shareholders, I told them we were willing to spend 5 to 10% of operating income for up to five years in this business, and we feel like we can get an economic return," Ballmer told a business lunch in Chicago, without elaborating on the timeframe.
The new search engine grabbed 12.1% of US searches for the 8-12 June work week, up from 11.3% from 1-5 June but trailing Google's 65% of US searches in May.
"You don't go from 8% to 80%. You have to be patient," said Ballmer. "We invested in Xbox for years and now it generates nice economic returns for us," he added, referring to the company's popular gaming console.
Microsoft reported operating income of $4.4 billion last quarter, which would mean Ballmer is envisaging spending up to $440 million per quarter, or almost $1.8 billion per year, developing Bing.
Microsoft does not break out investment in its various projects, so it's not clear if that is a significant increase in previous spending. Microsoft has continued to invest in internet projects, even though its online services business is a net drain on cash, losing $575 million last quarter alone.
Bing, fully launched on 3 June, is just the opening salvo in Microsoft's campaign to counter the dominance of Google in the search and related advertising business.
The world's largest software company, which is in talks with Yahoo over a potential partnership, has long been determined to play a role in that lucrative space after watching rival Google take a stranglehold on the market.
Ballmer regretted that Microsoft had not entered the internet search market earlier, saying that the company understood the technology's importance, but had not come up with a way to monetise it.
"If we could have one do-over I would probably say I would start sooner on search," said Ballmer. "Sometimes the error you make is what you don't do and don't see. Our mistake wasn't that we didn't see the technology change coming, we didn't see the business change coming."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
