Google: newspapers need to learn from Wikipedia
Posted on 8 May 2009 at 09:43
Google has hit back at suggestions it's harming newspaper journalism, by claiming the industry needs to alter its approach to publishing on the web.
At a US congress hearing entitled The Future of Journalism, Google's vice president of products Marissa Mayer began by reiterating the party line that newspapers make a healthy living out of Google traffic.
"Google connects internet users to journalists' work while at the same time helping journalists generate income to support their work, and providing tools to make news more compelling to readers and viewers," she told the hearing.
Intriguingly, she then went on to suggest that perhaps newspapers need to adapt their coverage to better suit the internet.
"Today, in online news, publishers frequently publish several articles on the same topic, sometimes with identical or closely related content, each at their own URL," Meyer said. "The result is parallel web pages that compete against each other in terms of authority, and in terms of placement in links and search results.
"Consider instead how the authoritativeness of news articles might grow if an evolving story were published under a permanent, single URL as a living, changing, updating entity.
"We see this practice today in Wikipedia's entries and in the topic pages at NYTimes.com. The result is a single authoritative page with a
consistent reference point that gains clout and a following of users over time."
What Mayer failed to acknowledge, however, was that failure to produce a new article for each update would result in the story failing to appear on Google News.
The debate comes as newspaper groups including Rupert Murdoch and The Guardian Media Group are beginning to voice concerns that the search giant uses their content without any direct payment.
Read our interview with Guardian Group's director of digital strategy and development, Simon Waldman in this month's PC Pro, on sale 14 May.
Author: Stuart Turton
advertisement
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


