Nvidia sued over faulty GPU "cover-up"
By Barry Collins
Posted on 10 Sep 2008 at 17:49
Nvidia is being sued on behalf of its shareholders for withholding information over faulty graphics chips.
Nvidia admitted earlier this summer that it had a problem with faulty GPUs that had affected laptop manufacturers including Dell and HP.
The lawsuit alleges that the company knew of the problem last year, but didn't disclose the issue to shareholders "in a series of false and misleading statements made to the investing public."
"The truth is that, at least as early as November 2007, Nvidia and the other defendants have known about these unprecedented failure rates as well as their 'root causes'," the lawsuit claims.
"Nevertheless, for at least eight months, defendants concealed from Nvidia investors these defects and their obvious impact on the company's financial condition and future business prospects," it adds.
Speaking at its NVISION conference last month, an Nvidia spokesman said it had been prevented from coming clean over the scale of the problem by PC manufacturers. "The truth is," he explained, "our obligations to our partners limits what we can say. We need to leave announcements to our partners like Dell and HP.
"I know there's frustration, and it would make my job easier if I could give out the facts that I know, but we have obligations to our partners. We discuss it constantly, and the company would like to be more upfront about this - but we can't be."
Financial meltdown
The lawsuit cites Intel's 1994 problems with its processors as an indication of the kind of "financial shockwaves" that can be created by faulty chips. "Intel was flooded with an avalanche of complaints and was forced to take a $475 million write down to compensate for repairs and returns," the suit states. "This kind of disaster scenario materialised for Nvidia earlier this year."
Nvidia admitted in July that the cost of repairs and returns for the faulty GPUs would cost up to $200 million.
The company declined to comment on the lawsuit.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
