Government "trying to make law vanish" for file sharers
By Barry Collins
Posted on 29 Jul 2008 at 10:10
A leading privacy expert and advisor to the House of Lords has warned the Government is trying to make the law "vanish" with its proposed suggestions for dealing with illegal file sharers.
Last week six leading ISPs, the BPI and the Government signed a Memorandum of Understanding that will see hundreds of thousands of warning letters sent out to alleged illegal file sharers.
Separately, a consultation document issued by the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform proposes a number of solutions for dealing with persistent offenders.
The Government's "preferred option" is a self-regulatory approach overseen by a regulator that would put an "obligation on ISPs to take action against subscribers to their network who are identified (by the rights holder) as infringing copyright through P2P."
A second proposed alternative, Option A1, suggests: "streamlining the existing process by requiring ISPs to provide personal data relating to a given IP address to rights holders on request without them needing to go to Court."
Click here to see the full list of Government proposals for dealing with illegal file sharers
Dr Richard Clayton, treasurer of the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR) and technical advisor to the House of Lords inquiry into Personal Internet Security, has grave concerns over the proposals.
"The implication [of the proposals] is that, for some reason, UK law has vanished and it becomes lawful for ISPs to hand over confidential or personal data to third parties without going through some formal process," he said.
"What it [the Government] is proposing is to bring a law to do this, but I don't think it will stand up in Europe, because it hasn't thought it through properly. There's no due process. The European court will throw it out."
"When everyone's explained that to the civil servants in the department... they're going to full well understand this isn't, as proposed, a starter."
Filtering out files
Dr Clayton is also bemused by another of the Government's proposed solutions, which will require that "ISPs allow the installation of filtering equipment that will block infringing content."
"This is insane," he said. "The security, control, access, all sorts of issues raised by this... they haven't thought these things through.
"They're not experts on the industry, and they are consulting - they're not just doing it. So I suppose we should all be grateful that they're asking 'is this sane?' before they go ahead."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
