ISP threatens to walk out of illegal file-sharing pact
By Barry Collins
Posted on 25 Jul 2008 at 09:54
A deep rift is already emerging between the ISPs and music industry bodies who have agreed to clamp down on illegal file sharing.
Yesterday, Britain's six leading ISPs, the British Phonographic Institute and the Government signed a Memorandum of Understanding in which they pledged to "significantly reduce illegal file sharing".
However, there's still a massive divide between ISPs and the BPI over how to punish repeat offenders, with the Carphone Warehouse telling PC Pro it would walk out on any deal which saw its customers' broadband connections cut off.
"The three strikes approach we've 100% ruled out," the Carphone spokesman told us. "We won't have anything to do with that."
"We will not disconnect or threaten to disconnect our customers. We will not divulge details of our customers to people like the BPI unless we get a specific court order to do so."
"What we have agreed to do is to write to our customers and advise them there's been an alleged infringement. We're very clear that we don't know if that's the case or not, we've just been told there has been and we want to advise them of that.
"We certainly won't pass over their details and we certainly won't disconnect them."
Three strikes still on the table?
Carphone's attitude is almost the polar opposite of the BPI's, which told PC Pro yesterday that it still wants to see a 'three strikes and you're out' punishment for repeat offenders.
"All of the ISPs have agreed to engage with us in terms of tackling this issue for people who won't respond to the letter," a BPI spokesman said.
"Most people don't want their account used unlawfully and illegally, but clearly there are people that are well aware of what they're doing and there needs to be a framework to tackle those people who won't respond to a softly-softly approach."
"All sorts of things are on the table. We've been very clear that we believe a three-step graduated response is the most clean and effective way of doing that."
BPI "not happy" with the deal
Other measures being considered to punish repeat offenders include throttling their connections and filtering their internet traffic. But Carphone Warehouse insists it's prepared to walk away from the table if draconian measures are introduced.
"Our priority is always to protect our customer. We will look at any sensible suggestion.... We haven't got any plans to adopt any of those other measures at the moment," the spokesman told us.
"We won't sign up for something we don't agree with. It's important to point out here this isn't a BPI initiative.
"The BPI isn't happy with this approach. It wants a 'three strikes and you're out approach' and I think it's coming round to realise that - well certainly I can speak for TalkTalk and Carphone Warehouse - there's no way that will happen. It may be other ISPs have said that to it [the BPI] as well."
BT refused to comment on its preferred means of dealing with repeat offenders, claiming that the group will "come to a view about the effectiveness of those [proposed] solutions."
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- Hello Cortana, it's nice to meet you
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word