ISPs yet to decide on file-sharer punishment
By Barry Collins
Posted on 24 Jul 2008 at 14:58
ISPs, Ofcom and the music industry have four months to reach an agreement on how to punish repeated illegal file-sharers, under a new deal signed today.
Britain's six biggest ISPs, the Government and the British Phonographic Institute (BPI) today signed a Memorandum of Understanding in which they pledged to "significantly reduce illegal file sharing".
Punishments including stripping repeat offenders of their broadband, throttling their connection and filtering their internet traffic all remain on the table.
But the BPI and ISPs have confirmed to PC Pro that no agreement has been reached on what constitutes a suitable punishment. Instead, the parties have a four-month consultation period to reach a conclusion.
A BPI spokesman told us that its preferred method of dealing with offenders remains its controversial "three strikes and you're out" scheme, under which broadband users are warned twice to stop sharing illegal files and have their broadband account terminated if they fail to respond to the previous two warnings. "That's what we believe is a sensible way to tackle repeat offenders," the BPI spokesman told PC Pro.
However, ISPs such as the Carphone Warehouse's TalkTalk remain rigidly opposed to such a penalty. "We will not divulge a customer's details or disconnect them on the say so of the content industry, but we will work with rights holders to develop a sensible and legal approach founded on protecting consumer rights and privacy," claims Carphone CEO Charles Dunstone.
A BT spokesman refused to comment on BT's preferred method of dealing with repeat offenders, saying that the ISPs, industry and Government will "come to a view about the effectiveness of those [proposed] solutions" by the end of the four-month consultation period.
Avoiding the courts
One measure that will be implemented immediately, however, is the sending out of hundreds of thousands of "informative letters" to customers of the six ISPs who are alleged to have downloaded or shared files illegally.
The BPI previously had to use the courts to force ISPs to hand over the names and addresses of customers, after identifying IP addresses that were being used on file-sharing sites.
Now the BPI will simply hand over the IP addresses of accounts it claims are being used for illegal file sharing, and leave it to the ISP to send out a warning letter.
"We never find out who the people are - and we don't want to know either," said the BPI spokesman. "We think that [the warning letter] will be incredibly effective. It will be a tap on the shoulder for some people."
The BT spokesman said he believed ISPs would bear the cost of sending out the letters. Last year, a similar deal between Tiscali and the BPI broke down in a row over who bore the costs of enforcement.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
