Google sued over migration tool
Posted on 24 Jun 2008 at 08:13
Google has been named in a trade secrets lawsuit alleging that the company's business software unit copied a tool for transferring customer's data from Microsoft software.
LimitNone filed a complaint in an Illinois circuit court alleging that Google at first began promoting a smaller firm's tool for migrating Microsoft Outlook customers to Gmail, then copied the idea and went into competition with it.
The lawsuit has been brought by the commercial litigation firm of Kelley Drye & Warren, the same team who previously faced off with Google in a trademark case involving the company's online advertising system.
The latest suit takes aim at the company's fast-growing Google Apps software application business, which includes Gmail for business users. Google is seeking to woo customers away from relying on rival Microsoft software.
The complaint accuses the web leader of engaging in deceptive business practices that chill competition. It seeks reimbursement from Google of actual damages, attorneys' fees and calls on the court to award punitive damages to LimitNone.
The case details LimitNone's meetings starting in March 2007 with Google to build a tool it called "gMove" for moving the e-mail, address books and calendars of corporate customers from Microsoft Corp's Outlook into Gmail. The suit alleges Google had trouble building a similar tool.
LimitNone said it entered a confidentiality deal with Google to share trade secrets of its email migration tool with Google engineers, sales people and key Google Apps customers.
Last December, the firm of less than five employees learned from Google that it planned to enter the market for LimitNone's migration product itself because the business opportunity promised to be huge, according to court papers.
Lead plaintiff's attorney David Rammelt says that LimitNone had been told by Google that 50 million subscribers was "just too big to come from someone else" and that a simple calculation of the lost revenue for LimitNone "very quickly gets you up to about $950 million."
Google introduced a free, competing e-mail migration tool called "Google Email Uploader" earlier this year, which the lawsuit alleges is "almost identical" to gMove and that "both operate under a similar conceptual design."
Following Google's decision to compete with it, LimitNone shifted its business to focus on the emerging market for business software designed to run on the Apple iPhone.
Rammelt was lead attorney in the American Blinds trademark case against Google's AdWords online advertising system. The plaintiffs in that case dropped their suit last September, a few months before going to trial, citing mounting legal costs. Google declared victory in the four-year trademark battle.
Google was not available to comment at the time of writing.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- I went to Glastonbury and the only thing that got high was my smartphone
- Meet the robots helping teach children
- PaperLater: would you pay to print the internet?
- Amazon vs Kobo: how much to make the ebook switch?
- Phishing emails: how I nearly got caught out
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?