Apple settles iPod battery lawsuit
By Barry Collins
Posted on 12 May 2008 at 08:49
Apple has settled two class-action lawsuits that alleged the company misled consumers over the battery life of its iPods.
The Canadian plaintiffs argued that Apple overstated the battery life of early generations of the player, claiming they were capable of up to ten hours of continuous music playback. The plaintiffs claims that the battery life rapidly sloped off after the batteries had been recharged.
Apple has agreed to settle the case, offering Canadian consumers who bought their iPods before 24 June 2004 a $44.75 credit at the Apple store.
To qualify for the discount, however, the battery life of their iPods needs to have dropped to five hours or less for the first and second generation of the device and four hours or less for the third generation. Quite how consumers prove the battery life of their device has diminished isn't clear.
Apple settled a similar case with US iPod owners in 2005.
Early iPods had a reputation for poor battery life, although that appears to have been remedied with recent generations of the device.
From around the web
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement
